My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02737
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02737
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:46:39 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:19:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.120
Description
Grand Valley Unit-Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/1/1981
Title
Plan of Study: Grand Valley Unit Stage Two
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />11'"} <br />('\") <br />r-- CHAPTER II <br /> <br />GENERAL APPROACH TO THE WORK <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />.'-:',A <br />~~:~;~~~~! <br /> <br />,-. <br />-- <br />-::-_") <br /> <br />National Environmental Policy Act <br /> <br />The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is the basic National charter <br />for protection of the environment. It establishes policy and sets goals, and <br />provides guidelines for carrying them out. Section 102(2) (c) required Federal <br />agencies to act in accordance with the spirit of the law and to prepare an en- <br />vironmental statement on any major Federal action. The m~PA process is in- <br />tended to help public officials make decisions that are based on understanding <br />the potential environmental consequences and take actions that protect, re- <br />store, and enhance the environment. <br /> <br />The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) published regulations for im- <br />plementation of the act. These regulations, which took effect July 30, 1979, <br />stress concentration on truly significant environmental issues rather than on <br />just amassing information. They also require early public involvement, early <br />availability of environmental information, and consideration of mitigation of <br />environmental impacts. Procedures, page limits, and formats for the environ- <br />mental statements are also suggested. NEPA compliance will be accomplished <br />prior to initiation of construction. <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act <br /> <br />The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401 as amended; 16 U.S.C. <br />661 et. seq.) requires the Bureau of Reclamation to consult with the Fish and <br />Wildlife Service on water development projects which could impact fish and <br />wildlife resources. The Fish and Wildlife Service, in conjunction with the <br />State wildlife resource agency, will review proposed Bureau of Reclamation <br />developments and submit a report that may recommend actions to compensate, en- <br />hance or mitigate the wildlife resources. At the present time, the Bureau is <br />not authorized to implement a mitigation plan on salinity units. However, it <br />will develop a fish and wildlife plan in cooperation with the Fish and Wi]d- <br />life Service and the plan will be submitted to Congress to be considered for <br />authorization. The Bureau is required to include Fish and Wildlife Service <br />findings and recommendat ions in the final proj ec t_pl-ari. <br />I"f0t <br />Endangered Species Act <br /> <br />The Endangered Species Act as amended in 1978, requir"s developmental <br />agencies to informally consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service to obtain <br />lists of species which are threatened or endangered or are proposed for des- <br />ignation as either threatened or endangered and can be found in the project <br />area. The agency will then prepare a biological assessment: evaluating which, <br />if any, of the species might be affected by the project. If potential j eop- <br />ardy to a species exists, the agency will formally consult: with the Fish and <br />Wildlife Service and obtain a biological opinion expressing the degree of jeop- <br />ardy and any reasonable and prudent alternatives to avoid impacts. <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.