My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02696
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:46:28 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:18:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.30.B
Description
UCRBRIP Instream Flow Approprations
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/8/1993
Author
UCRBRIP
Title
Colorado River Flow Data at Colorado-Utah State Line
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Data
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0015;j;i <br /> <br />WATER USER FEES: <br /> <br />Section 7 consultalionfees: Fees could be assessed by the USFWS in the course of <br />completing section 7 consultations for water facilities a choose to rely upon the Program, <br />The fee structure could be similar to that currently in use on an interim basis for the Front <br />Range "existing facility owners," Fees assessed against "existing facility owners" on the <br />present interim basis would continue over the life of the Program. Alternatively, a <br />di fferent fee structure could be formulated. <br /> <br />Water use surcharge: Water supply entities in the Platte River Basin could agree to <br />assess their customers a small use fee per quantity of water delivered. The water entities <br />would in turn make direct payments to the Program, The fee could be structured in a <br />stratified or block-rate manner to reflect differences in water use patterns and financial <br />capability. For example, a municipal water agency with an average annual demand of <br />50,000 acre-feet/year could assess its customers I cent/IOOO gallons. This would generate <br />$163,000 ({50,000 acre-feet per year * 326,000 gallons per acre-foot / 1000 gallons} * I <br />cent = $163,000). Distributed across 50,000 households, this fee would amount to $3,26 <br />per year for each household. Similarly, a ditch company serving 25,000 acres at 2.5 acre- <br />feet per acre could assess its shareholders 10 cents per acre-fool. This would generate <br />$6,250. Distributed across the acreage irrigated by the ditch company, this would add a <br />$.25 operation cost per acre to the shareholders' annual expenses. These fees could be <br />voluntary and limited to members of the Platte River Project as an expectation and <br />requirement of membership, or water supply entities could be directed by state statute to <br />establish the fees. <br /> <br />OTHER FEES AND TAXES: <br /> <br />Wildlife Cash: Revenue from the sale of fishing and hunting licenses could be <br />dedicated annually to the Program by legislative appropriation. <br /> <br />Development Impact Fees: By state statute, units oflocal government <br />(municipalities and counties) could be directed to collect impact fees on new development <br />(i,e" construction permits, special use permits, etc,) for deposit into a dedicated account. <br />Rates could be specified in the statute or certified to the local government units by some <br />other credible means, <br /> <br />Ad Valorem Tax: By state statute, units of local government could be directed to <br />levy ad valorem taxes on taxable real property rights, including water rights, for deposit <br />into a dedicated account. Rates could be specified in the statute or certified to the local <br />government units by some other credible means. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.