Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />001022 <br /> <br />D. Alternative Plan Selection <br /> <br />After the alternatives presented in Section IV-C were reviewed by the TAC <br />and the property owners, the CONSULTANT then assembled the alternatives into <br />several plans for further consideration. The effects of each plan on the <br />sediment transport (and therefore maintenance requirements and offsite impacts) <br />were evaluated along with the relative capital costs. These plans were then <br />graphically illustrated and presented at a joint meeting of the TAC and the <br />property owners. A summary of the alternative plans is presented in Table-2. <br /> <br />Subsequent to the general presentat i on of the alternat i ve pl ans, i nd i vi- <br />dual meetings were held between the primary effected property owners to discuss <br />the plans further. Based upon the meetings, a selected plan was assembled, <br />which is illustrated in Figure-lO. A preliminary design was then prepared for <br />the selected alternative plan (see Chapter V). <br /> <br />-30- <br />