My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02645
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02645
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:37:55 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
5700
Description
Flood Protection Section - Flood Control Projects
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
7/1/1985
Author
BRW Inc - WRC Engine
Title
Feasibility Study for the Cherry Creek Basin Drainageway - for Cherry Creek Basin TAC and Parker-Jordan Metropolitan District
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />001021 <br /> <br />Thirdly, a detailed analysis of the currently defined lOO-year floodplain <br />(Greiner, 1984) revealed that the flow conditions are really two separate, <br />hydraul ically disconnected flood profiles for Reach A only. When modelled <br />using HEC-2 (a quaisi-two dimensional analysis) to more closely match the <br />actual flow conditions. the lOO-year water surface profile in the main channel <br />was found to be generally hi9her than previously predicted. Also considerably <br />less flow was found to be in the right (east) overbank area. The analysis was <br />performed using both the high and low n-values to determine the worst <br />conditions. <br /> <br />Us i ng the above fi ndi ngs, the pre 1 imi nary des i gn approach for overbank <br />channelization with improvements to the main channel was revised from that <br />previously discussed at the progress meetings for the project. Channel <br />improvements were considered which shaped the main channel to more closely <br />match the average active bed width for Cherry Creek or let the main channel in <br />essentially the present condition, and excavated the overbank area to provide <br />additional capacity. Both configurations were evaluated in detail and <br />recommended for portions of the study area. <br /> <br />The proposed channel for Reach A more closely matches the existing channel <br />and therefore the sedimentation and erosion characteristics are similar to the <br />present conditions and will have minimal impact on downstream property owners. <br />Since the unstable flow conditions are in the main channel. the channel banks <br />must be protected at the critical location. Whereas an unprotected artificial <br />channel would not be as stable as the natural channel, a program of regular <br />maintenance combined with bank protection at the critical areas will address <br />this concern. <br /> <br />The channelization recommended for portions of Reach B included excavation <br />for the overbank area and revetments for the existing bends in the main <br />channel. By leaving the main channel in its historic configuration. the <br />changes in the sedimentation characteristics are minimal for low to inter- <br />mediate flows (up to the lO-year flood). For larger floods, the increased <br />overbank depths and removal of existing vegetation increases the potential for <br />erosion. To minimize this potential, the overbank areas must be revegetated in <br />accordance with the program outlined in Section V-F. <br /> <br />-29- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.