My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02645
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02645
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:37:55 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:15:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
5700
Description
Flood Protection Section - Flood Control Projects
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
7/1/1985
Author
BRW Inc - WRC Engine
Title
Feasibility Study for the Cherry Creek Basin Drainageway - for Cherry Creek Basin TAC and Parker-Jordan Metropolitan District
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />00il992 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4. Review and utilize hydrology developed by U.S. Army Corps of <br />Engineers, and hydraulic calculations for the f10odplain/f100dway by <br />Greiner Engineering Sciences. <br /> <br />5. Complete the hydraulic analysis of Cherry Creek to determine the <br />capacity and general condition of all drainage features. <br /> <br />6. Defi ne drai nage probl ems and flood hazards for the purpose of <br />formulating alternatives. <br /> <br />7. Prepare hydraulic calculations to evaluate the best alternative <br />plans. <br /> <br />8. Rev i ew and evaluate impacts of present Federal Emergency Ma nagement <br />Agency (FEMA) policies. <br /> <br />9. Consider operation and maintenance aspects of the best alternatives. <br /> <br />10. Perform a qual itative analysis of the river morphology and <br />sedimentation characteristics. <br /> <br />11. Consi der impact of each alternative on the water qua 1 ity in the <br />basin. <br /> <br />12. Conduct a benefit/cost analysis for the alternatives. <br /> <br />13. Prepare a report summarizing the above work. <br /> <br />During the course of the work, two major changes to the scope of services <br />occurred. First, the benefit/cost analysis effort (item 12) was reduced from <br />that specified by the contract due to the problems associated with identifying <br />land values for each parcel. Alternatives were compared on the basis of costs <br />and a qualitative analysis for each benefit was performed to aid in the review <br />of the a lternat i ves. Second, due to the potent i al impact of the selected <br />alternative on the existing Aurora well field and other wells in the area, the <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.