My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02622
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02622
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:37:49 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:14:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.400
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/2003
Author
US DoI BoR
Title
Draft Environmental Assessment For the Pueblo West Pipeline and Pumping Station Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.~,:, n /1 ~.: <br />/:U''X') <br /> <br />Table 3.1 Summary Matrix of Resource Impacts under the Current Situation, No Action <br />Alternative and the Construction Alternative. <br />Resource Current No Action Alternative Construction Alternative <br />Hydrology (c6nl.) <br />Pueblo Board of -Pueblo Board of Water Works -No diversions would be made -Pueblo West would only <br />Water Works 17 is required to make 17 cfs by Pueblo West; no imp8cts to divert water released for their <br />CFS Raw Water releases from Pueblo Reservoir the 17 cfs releases would occur use; Pueblo West generally <br />Releases and to supplement Arkansas River would divert in summer and <br />Diversions to the flows when it drops below 50 Pueblo Board of Water Works <br />Comanche Pump cfs releases are expected to be in <br />Station and winter; no impacts are <br />Whitlock Water anticipated to 17 cfs releases <br />Treatmeat Plant or diversions to the Comanche <br /> Pump Station and Whitlock <br /> Water Treatment Plant <br />Water Quality -Arkansas River water quality -No impacts are expected, -Potential for temporary <br /> downstream of Pueblo because no:construction impacts to Arkansas River <br /> Reservoir is reflective of water activities would occur water quality due to soil <br /> released from reservoir storage disturbance by construction <br /> activities <br />Recreation <br />White Water -State of Colorado and -No change in net river flow or -No change in net river flow or <br />R8fting on the Reclamation work impact to r8fting is 8nticipated impact to rafting is anticipated <br />Arkansas River collaboratively to provide as a result of no action as a result of the Construction <br /> desirable flows for white water Alternative <br /> rafting on the Arkansas <br /> between July I and August 15 <br />Rock Canyon -The West Pueblo Ditch -No changes to the existing -Modification to the diversion <br />Swim Beach diversion which supplies water Pueblo West structure are structure has potential to <br /> to the Rock C8nyon Swim anticipated, therefore no disrupt flows to the West <br /> Beach is located impacts to either the West Pueblo Ditch during <br /> approximately V, miles Pueblo Ditch diversion construction activities and <br /> downstream of the Pueblo structure or its diversions are permanently if the design <br /> West's existing riprap expected impedes flows <br />. diversion <br />Threatened and -Multiple species potentially -No net changes in Arkansas - No aet chaages in Arkansas <br />Endangered present within the action area River or Pueblo Reservoir 8nd River or Pueblo Reservoir, and <br />Species no ground disturbing 8ctivities no species or critical habitat in <br /> - no effect area of ground disturbance - <br /> no effect <br />Cultural -There is potential for cultaral -No effect .to cultural resources - No effect to cultural <br />Resour,ces resources throughout the, is expecteq because: (I) there resources is expected because: <br /> action area . will be no net ch8nges in (1) there will be no net <br /> Arkansas River or Pueblo changes in Arkansas River or <br /> Reservoir, 'and (2) because no Pueblo Reservoir, and (2) <br /> ground disturbing activities are because the survey of areas . <br /> anticipated with ground disturbing <br /> activities indicated that no <br /> cultural resources were oresent <br />Noxious Weeds -Several populations of -No increase in the spread of -Ground disturbing activities <br /> Russian kn8pweed and salt nox.ious weeds is anticipated associated with Construction <br /> cedar exist within the area because nq ground disturbing Alternative have potential to . <br /> where ground disturbing activities ~e anticipated spread noxious weeds <br /> activities will occur <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.