My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02600
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02600
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:37:42 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:13:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.100
Description
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project - Project Description
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1975
Author
Terence Brace
Title
The History of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0650 <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br /> <br />the water rights of Twin Lakes Reservoir and Canal Company which <br /> <br />received water frow the Roaring Fork River, one of the diversion <br /> <br />streams. This matter was resolved when it was agreed that water <br />from Hunter Creek would be diverted to Twin Lakes in the same <br />45 <br />amount as the water being diverted from the Roaring Fork. <br />Also of consequence was the fact that people of the Western <br />Slope dia not favor Ruedi Reservoir, which they fel~ would in- <br />terfer witn tneir Blue South Platte Project, so Aspen Reservoir <br />46 <br />was used as a replacement for Huedi Heservoir. The purpose <br />of this reservoir was to store water which would be used for <br />1+7 <br />replacement purposes in Western Colorado. ThG final problem <br />or event was the changing of the name of the Project from Gun- <br />'-1.tJ <br />ni.son-Arkansas to Fryingpan A!'kansas. This was done so people <br /> <br />would not feel that the entire program was being pushed, just <br /> <br /> <br />the Fryingpan-Arkansas which was being stressed as an entire <br /> <br /> <br />project in and of itself. <br /> <br /> <br />To review briefly, the major accomplishments of the <br /> <br /> <br />Policy and Review Committee were; (1) to subst itute Aspen <br /> <br /> <br />Reservoir for Ruedi Reservoir, (2) resolve the water rights of <br /> <br /> <br />Twin I,akes Reservoir, and Canal Company, (3) settle thl question <br /> <br /> <br />of minimum stream flows, and (.4) changing the name of tne project <br /> <br /> <br />from the Gunnison-Arkansas Project to the Pryingpan-Arkansas Project. <br /> <br />45 <br />Interview with Cleland Feast, Denver, Colorado, <br />october 29461974, pp. 123, 124. <br /> <br />Christy, p. 46. <br />47 <br />Text of Proposed Principles of operation for Proposed <br />Fi~st phase, Gunnison-Arkansas project, Appendix B, Minutes of <br />the Policy and Review Committee, p. 4. <br />4tl <br />l3eise, p. 3. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.