Laserfiche WebLink
<br />on?j(3 <br /> <br />SUMMARY <br /> <br />WOLF CREEK VALLEY SKI AREA <br />REVISED DRAFT ENVIRONMENI'AL IMPACI' STATEMENI' <br /> <br />This sLmmary of the Revised Draft Environmental Impact statal1ent (RDEIS) <br />discloses the projected environmental consequences of developing a new alpine <br />ski area southwest of Wolf Creek Pass at a site known as Windy Pass. The <br />proposed development is within the San Juan National Forest, and the site is <br />designated Management Area IB in the Forest r s Land and Resource Managal1ent <br />Plan. This designation allows for further study for potential develorroent of <br />downhill skiing by the private sector. <br /> <br />The proposed ski area is part of an overall year-round resort to be <br />developed by vlestfork Investment, Ltd. The total developnE!nt involves both <br />private land and public U.S.F.S. land. There are 2,365 acres of Forest Service <br />land involved in the ski area proposal which has approximately 3000 vertical <br />feet for skiing on 904 acres of groomed trails which would accommodate 11,750 <br />skiers-at-one-time. <br /> <br />The site is located in Mineral County and is 12 miles northeast of pagosa <br />Springs, Colorado, the county seat of Archuleta County. Maps 1 and 2 in <br />Chapter I of the Revised DEIS graphically illustrate the location of the <br />proposed developnent. <br /> <br />IURPOSE AND NRP.I1 <br /> <br />Westfork Investment, Ltd. submitted an application to the Forest Service on <br />January 30, 1984 for a Special Use Permit to develop the proposed ski area. <br />The Regional Forester authorized this study of the proposal on April 5, 1984. <br /> <br />The proposal also requires approval by the Colorado state Highway <br />Department and the Federal Highway Administration to relocate about one mile of <br />U.S. Highway 160 to the west. The highway relocation (about 550 feet west of <br />the existing alignment) will allow adequate land for the ski area base and will <br />avoid potential hazards resulting from crowding of skier base facilities. The <br />environmental analysis of the proposed realignment is it~orr~rated and <br />documented below. other resort developnent on the 2,564 acres of private land <br />required approval by Mineral County Board of County Commissioners. <br /> <br />The ski area is proposed to be developed in phases, each phase representing <br />a three to five year construction period. l>I.arket demand will be the primary <br />factor dictating the timing and length of each phase. The first phase <br />development will accommodate 4,050 skiers-at-one-time. The total resort <br />developnent is planned to span over 20 years and to occur in three major <br />phases. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES INCLUDI~ THE PROPOSED ACTION <br /> <br />The Revised DEIS analyzes three alternatives. Five additional alternatives <br />were considered but rejected from detailed analysis. Each of these <br />alternatives had certain physical and/or economic costs that retrlered than <br />impractical or unattractive for developnent. <br /> <br />iii <br />