Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002~!.t6 <br /> <br />with Alternative Two construction on both private and public lands could <br />result in a 5 to 20 year change in use of big game movement corridors, <br />calving/fawning areas and general summer use. <br /> <br />Long-term impacts from ski trail developnent will create additional <br />habitat diversity and edge. Habitats for some species may be improved <br />through this clearing. However, some species nay pot utilize these habitats <br />because of increased human disturbance and harassment. I'any species of <br />non-game and/or small game may find these new habitats very attractive. <br />"Back bowl" developnent could adversely affect cover/forage ratios that are <br />nearly at optimum at present. <br /> <br />Impacts with respect to the west facing side of the mountain, private <br />land and realignment of u.s. Highway 160 are essentially the same in <br />Alternative Three as those for Alternative Two. There would be less <br />disturbance to big game, calving and fawning, migration and general stm:mer <br />use in the back bowls. Some human encroachment would still result, however, <br />from the mountain and private land developnent. <br /> <br />Fconornic F.nvironment <br /> <br />1. Economic Base <br /> <br />The lack of ski developnent in Alternative One would not provide for any <br />new downhill skiing recreation opportunities and tourism and would not <br />create any demands for new goodS or services. Nor will any incremental <br />revenues for or costs to local government be created. Alternatives Two or <br />Three will expand the loca.l economic base mostly in the trade, services, <br />finance, real estate, and construction industries. <br /> <br />2. En]plcwnent/Un€llJPlo,yment <br /> <br />Alternative One will not alter the current employment situation, but <br />adjacent private land developnent will provide certain employment <br />opportunities. A~ternatives Two or Three will provide gradually increasing <br />cUrect enployment from the beginning of construction until the year 2020. <br />C~- and off-site secondary employment follows a generally similar increasing <br />pattern of direct, basic on-site employment patterns over the 35 year <br />analysis period. <br /> <br />Although unemployment will generally be reduced through providing new <br />work opportunities there is the potential for creating a larger seasonal <br />employment problEm in tl'>e spring. A~so, the advent of new people moving to <br />the community in anticipation of new job opportunities could create a problem <br />if they do not have the appropriate skills and sufficient economic resources. <br /> <br />3. Housin9 <br /> <br />Alternative One would not create any demand for tourist or employee <br />housing. A~terr~tive Two and Three will generate 1,074 on- site units (both <br />tourist and employee) by 1995, 1,861 units by 2005 and 2,830 units by 2020. <br />~lost new permanent residents generated by direct and indhect employment will <br /> <br />ix <br />