Laserfiche WebLink
<br />26 <br /> <br />3892 <br /> <br />MISSOURI RIVER BASIN <br /> <br />. 31. Local intcrests are definitely of the opinion that more adequate <br />prol.cction than is provided by existing works is necessary. They <br />also are convinced this must. be accomplished through some unified <br />and well-coordinated ph111, and that the problem is of such magnitude <br />that the burden must be assumed by t.he Federal Govcrnment. This <br />general n.t.t.itude is reflecteu in the discussions in the public hearings <br />held in connection with this report (see 11ppendi.,,< II),' by numerous <br />resolutions adopted uy local orgl1nizl1tions and by the mftny recp.nt <br />contracts with locll.I interests in cOllllection with repair of levees under <br />provisions of section 5 of the 1941 Flood Control Act. <br /> <br />IV. PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL PLAN <br /> <br />32. The plan of flood control proposcd herein consists of a serics of <br />levees ond appurtenant works along both sides of the river from Sioux <br />City, Iowa, to the mouth of the Missouri River, supplementcd by the <br />presently authorized reservoirs in Nebraska, Kansas.. und ~1issollri, <br />and fl.dditionAI multiple-purpose reservoirs, including reservoirs above <br />Sioux City. This plan would provide flood protection for agricultural <br />1I1I1ds along both sides of the river and protection for the cities of <br />Sioux City, Iowa; Council Bluffs, Iowa; Omaha, Nebr.; and the <br />Kansas Citys, Knns. and Mo. A plan for the protcction of tbe <br />Kansas Citys is described in a survcy report prepnred by the district <br />engineer, K.ansl1s City, dated June 27, 1042, und no chango in that <br />pIon is proposed hercin. The general alignment of tbe proposccllevees <br />is shown on sheets 1 to 9 and the proposed profile of the desigu (Iood <br />is shown on sheets 10 to 1.5, appendix l.' <br />33. In dct.ermining the degrce of protection which should be pro- <br />vided by the levees, the following faetors were considered: <br />(a) The effect on futurc flood dischargcs of the operat.ion of the <br />system of authorized reservoirs ill the lower part of the basin. <br />(b) The effect on future flood dischargcs of the operation of lDultiple- <br />purpose reservoirs upstremn from Sioux City. <br />, (c) The height to which it is practicable to construct earth levees <br />along the Missouri River without danger of destruction by founda- <br />tion failurc or by dcvelopment of sand boils. <br />(d) The amount of sct-hack of the levees which would be re- <br />quired to provide adequftte Iloodway capacity. <br />34. Flood discharges ftre, usually greatest in the lower part of the <br />river, which area normally receives the greatest amount of rainfall. <br />Also the valley in the lower end is considerably narrower thftn in the <br />,upper part. Consequently, the relati\'c degree of prot.eclion which <br />can be economically provided by levces alone is considembly less III <br />the lower part of the river thun in the upper river. This emphasizes <br />the nend for eomplction of the reservoirs now authorizeu for the lower <br />part of the river <br />. 35. Complete protection against all floods of record by levees alone <br />IS Impracticable. However, the levees proposed herein, supplemented <br />by the presently authorized reservoirs in the lower part of the basin <br />and the additional multiple-purpose reservoirs would. provide protec- <br />t.ion bet'\vcen SiOllX, (;it,y, Town, nnd the mouth against all pnst floods <br />of record. <br /> <br />I Only pl. 16 i~ printed. <br />1 Not printed. <br />