Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.'_ "__---:-'__.~~-~-..- _'-7'~j"~_" <br />-" - - <br /> <br />-- -'-"':'-t':~;:,-"'~'; <br /> <br />._~_.,__ ,:r,,::~""-7 <br /> <br />-::c';;;Y'''1i;.>;,,:--''_''):," <br /> <br />--~""-""-'- ,;::~,~.'-r~,f,....~,.., -'W,:_?'>,~.',~~-_:-.-'-. ~.~ <br />.:~__': __ - -':t~{~)~ <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />C'.J <br />N <br />N <br /> <br />ft <br /> <br />21. <br /> <br />installed capacity 411,600 k~. manufacturer1s rated cap- <br />acity, which, at $g7.50 per k~., ;~uld require an invest- <br />ment cost of ~36,015,000. Applying the fixed charges <br /> <br />covering all costs except fuel, and adding the fuel costs <br />at various prices, produced the annual cost of generating <br />this energy in the substitute steam plant. From these <br /> <br />total costs, : subtracted the respective costs of gener- <br />ation and transmission by the Joulder and steam systems <br />(exclusive of falling ~ater) and obtained the annual <br />amount available for falling ~'ater at each price of fuel <br />oil. Jy dividing eacA of these annual amounts available <br />for fe.lling "!ater by 1,647,000,000 kr'-hrs. of primary <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />energy at Boulder Dam, the following results ~ere obtained <br />for the competi ti ve values of falling "'ater for primary <br /> <br />energy in mills per kiloryatt-hour at Boulder Dam: <br /> <br />Competitive Value :of Falling 'Hater <br />For Primary ~nergy <br />~ills per Kw-hr. at Boulder Dam <br />Based on Based on <br />Fixed Charges per Fixed Charges <br />Jureau of If Privately <br />Po"'er e.nd Light C'med <br /> <br />Price of Fuel eil <br />per bbl. <br />Prcsent Steam Plant 2ff. <br />.,,; .90 <br />.95 <br />1.00 <br />1.10 <br />Future Steam Plant Zff. <br />;;iI.IO <br />1.20 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mills nor Kw-Hr. <br />- .737 <br />.g63 <br />.941 <br />1. 095 <br />.nl <br />1.112 <br /> <br />]['i118 per Kw-hr. <br />.511 <br />.5M <br />.665 <br />.g19 <br />.695 <br />.g3g <br /> <br />A. 3. Roberts <br />