My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02515
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:37:19 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:10:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/30/1962
Author
L. N. McClellan
Title
Report to the Engineering Committee of the Upper Colorado River Commission on the Transmission System for the Colorado River Storage Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />marketing areas and criteria. <br /> <br /> <br />~ The so-called MOdified Transmission system proposed by <br /> <br /> <br />the Bureau of Reclamation and shown on Fig. 1, was an all-Federal <br /> <br /> <br />transmission system which .the Bureau considered adequate to deliver <br /> <br />C.R.S.P. power to preference customers in Arizona, Colorado, New <br /> <br />Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. This all-Federal txansmission system <br /> <br />was the starting point for.the negotiations between the Bureau and <br /> <br />the Investor-OWned power cOmpanies. <br /> <br /> <br />As a basis for the negotiations with the power companies, <br /> <br /> <br />the Bureau of Reclamation first undertook to make load projections <br /> <br /> <br />for all of the preference customers in the area to be supplied with <br /> <br />C.R.S.P.power. Each preference customer was requested to sub1llit <br />estimates of its future load requirements, together with its present <br /> <br />and proposed generating capacities. While some of the Investor-OWDed <br /> <br /> <br />power. companies have indicated that they think the load projeotions <br /> <br /> <br />are overly optimistic, in some instances these load projections have <br /> <br /> <br />been accepted for the purposes of power flow studies and for planning <br /> <br /> <br />the proposed transmission system for the C.R.S.P. <br /> <br /> <br />The load projections indicated that by 1973 the loads <br /> <br /> <br />of the preference customers in the Upper Basin would absorb all of <br /> <br /> <br />the C.R.S.P. power that has been allocated to the Upper Basin. That <br /> <br /> <br />is the withdrawal of C.R.S.P. power from the Lower Basin would have <br /> <br /> <br />been completed by that time. <br />. 'mle next step in the planning of an interconnected and <br />integrated transmission system for the C.R.S.P. was an extensive <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.