Laserfiche WebLink
<br />marketing areas and criteria. <br /> <br /> <br />~ The so-called MOdified Transmission system proposed by <br /> <br /> <br />the Bureau of Reclamation and shown on Fig. 1, was an all-Federal <br /> <br /> <br />transmission system which .the Bureau considered adequate to deliver <br /> <br />C.R.S.P. power to preference customers in Arizona, Colorado, New <br /> <br />Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. This all-Federal txansmission system <br /> <br />was the starting point for.the negotiations between the Bureau and <br /> <br />the Investor-OWned power cOmpanies. <br /> <br /> <br />As a basis for the negotiations with the power companies, <br /> <br /> <br />the Bureau of Reclamation first undertook to make load projections <br /> <br /> <br />for all of the preference customers in the area to be supplied with <br /> <br />C.R.S.P.power. Each preference customer was requested to sub1llit <br />estimates of its future load requirements, together with its present <br /> <br />and proposed generating capacities. While some of the Investor-OWDed <br /> <br /> <br />power. companies have indicated that they think the load projeotions <br /> <br /> <br />are overly optimistic, in some instances these load projections have <br /> <br /> <br />been accepted for the purposes of power flow studies and for planning <br /> <br /> <br />the proposed transmission system for the C.R.S.P. <br /> <br /> <br />The load projections indicated that by 1973 the loads <br /> <br /> <br />of the preference customers in the Upper Basin would absorb all of <br /> <br /> <br />the C.R.S.P. power that has been allocated to the Upper Basin. That <br /> <br /> <br />is the withdrawal of C.R.S.P. power from the Lower Basin would have <br /> <br /> <br />been completed by that time. <br />. 'mle next step in the planning of an interconnected and <br />integrated transmission system for the C.R.S.P. was an extensive <br />4 <br />