Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />with C.R.S.P. building certain components,and Utah Power and Light Co., <br /> <br />building other components, and with no chrages to be paid by either <br /> <br />party for wheeling over the pooled transmission facilities. Each <br /> <br />party would supply the energy losses associated with the power trans- <br /> <br />mitted over the pooled facilities. This proposed pooled transmission <br /> <br />proposal was not acceptable to the Utah Power and Light Company. <br /> <br />The utah Power and Light company submitted a proposal to the <br /> <br />Bureau for wheeling C.R.S.P. power from Glen canyon to certain points <br /> <br /> <br />of delivery to preference customers in Utah. (see Fig. 4). The <br /> <br /> <br />wheeling charge under the Company's proposal is 0.82 mills per kw. hour. <br /> <br /> <br />Computations of the wheeling charge using the Bureau's projections of <br /> <br />the loads of the preference customers in Utah, indicate that the <br /> <br />wheeling charge in year 1980 would amount fo $770,300, and that the <br /> <br />average annual wheeling charge over the full repayment period would <br /> <br />amount to $715,000 per year. <br /> <br />As stated above, the wheeling proposal of the Utah Power and <br /> <br />Light Company, provides for delivery of C.R.S.P. power at certain <br /> <br />specified points of delivery on the Company's transmission system. <br /> <br />The preference customers or the Bureau would have to pay additional <br /> <br />wheeling charges to the Company for transmitting the power from these <br /> <br />specified main points of delivery to the preference customers. These <br /> <br />additional wheeling charges have not as yet been negotiated or <br />evaluated. <br /> <br />An alternative to the Utah power and Light Company's wheeling <br /> <br />proposal is the construction by the Bureau of an independent trans- <br /> <br />20 <br />