Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~ <br /> <br />C) <br />C) <br />N <br />Cfj <br />(...._\ <br />o <br /> <br />. Treasury under subparagrachs (1), (2), and (3) of sllb-. <br />section (d) of this section shall be apportioned to the <br />State in which such participating projects, or part thereof, <br />is located. <br /> <br />b. As handled in Pa.orer Repaymant Study: <br /> <br />(1) Seedskadee power features carpleted in 1968; but net <br /> <br />annual power revenues not apportioned to Wyaning until <br /> <br />2019. <br /> <br />(2) . Central Utah power features scheduled for conpletion in <br /> <br />1989; but net annual power revenues not apportioned to <br /> <br />Utah until 2039. <br /> <br />(3) Above is based on premise that these power features \\Ould <br />not achieve repaymant on their own in less than 50 years. <br />(4) The PRS shows power investnent of these facilities <br /> <br />actually paid off from. Storage Units power revenues by year <br /> <br />2001. <br /> <br />c.Power Custoners' Position - The proposed power rate \\Ould be <br />about 5% less if revenues from these projects are apportioned <br />to the respective States starting the year after power invest- <br />rrent is expected to be repaid instead of assumed 50 years <br />constraint of WAPA. <br /> <br />7. 0l'HER ISSUFS <br /> <br />a. Magnitude of transmission system losses in the future. 7% <br /> <br />loss factor nay be too high. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />