My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02511
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02511
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:37:18 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:10:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8042.A
Description
Section D General Studies - Other States - Arizona
State
AZ
Basin
Statewide
Date
7/1/1966
Author
Arizona Interstate S
Title
20 th Annual Report of the Arizona Interstate Stream Commission
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
169
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />nD25~2 <br /> <br />build a thermal plant in association with the public utilities of <br />WEST (Western Energy Supply and Transmission Associates). <br />CAP would be financed by a .6-cent property tax in three bene- <br />ficiary counties-Maricopa, Pinal and Pima-and/or by in- <br />creasing municipal and industrial water charges to maintain <br />a $10-per-acre-foot irrigation level. <br /> <br />Other provisions of the administration proposal : Marble <br />Canyon would be placed within Grand Canyon National Park <br />by separate legislation. The question of the 4.4-million-acre-foot <br />guarantee to California would be left to Congress to decide. <br />There would be no provision for a, study of water importation <br />from the Pacific Northwest. And the question of a Basin account <br />to receive revenues from Hoover, Parker and Davis Dams after <br />their pay-out would be left for the C.olorado' River states to <br />make a recommendation to Congress. (Hoover would be the <br />first to payout in 1987.) <br /> <br />Secretary Udall said the question of building Hualapai Dam <br />also would be left for future consideration by Congress. If such <br />a p,am were built, he said, it should be a high darn. , <br /> <br />Arizonans reacted somewhat ambivalently to the admin- <br />istration proposal. The property tax idea worried Senators <br />Hayden and Fannin, although the former's administrative assist- <br />ant, Roy Elson, said Senator Hayden might introduce the admin- <br />istration bill just to get it going. Congressman U daIl said he <br />was standing pat on the Arizona bilt 'which the state's three <br />representatives had introduced earlier. Rich Johnson, executive <br />director of the Arizona Interstate Str'eam Commission, thought <br />the new plan should neutralize opposition from the Sierra Club <br />. and the Pacific Northwest. "It looks tome." he said, "like the <br />secretary looked at last year's experience and has backed away <br />from the compIlcated Basin project and is coming up with <br />something simpler that has a better chance of passing." <br /> <br />Governor Williams was dubious and, he said, "bewildered" <br />by the proposal for an ad valorem tax. "It is certainly, I believe, <br />a departure from any previous method of financing similar <br />projects insofar as legislative or administrative policy' is con- <br />cerned," he said. The chief executive did find encouragement, <br />however, in the fact that "positive action" toward a CAP was <br />now being taken by the administration. <br /> <br />Spokesmen for the Arizona Power Authority expressed dis- <br />appointment at the proposal to bring Marble Canyon within <br />Grand Canyon National Park. <br /> <br />Probably the strongest language used by an Arizonan in <br />the wake of the administration announcement came from State <br />Sen. Ray Goetze (R-Maricopa), who charged that it was a <br />"double-cross" by Secretary Udall. He said he regretted having <br />supported a moratorium on Colorado River dam-building and <br />said that if Arizona had gone ahead with the construction of <br />Marble Canyon Darn, it would be, nearly completed by now. <br />(Shortly after the Udall announcement, memorials were intro- <br /> <br />-41- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.