Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i <br />Once model implementation wa$ <br />complete, five representative resource <br />alternatives were identified. Then, the <br />screening tool was demonstrated using the <br />selected resource alternatives. Finallr, a <br />detailed integrated analysis of each I <br />alternative resource was demonstrat~d, <br />which simulated operational integrati~n of <br />the resource into the interconnected : <br />power grid. <br /> <br />Proof-of-Concept Results <br /> <br />Five hypothetical replacement : <br />resource alternatives were identified ito <br />demonstrate the methods, tools, and I <br />techniques for resource evaluation ~d <br />acquisition. These resource alternatives <br />illustrated the varying characteristics of <br />replacement power arrangements' that <br />Western may encounter in the acqui~ition <br />phase of its Replacement Resource i <br />Process, including alternative pricin~ <br />structures, alternative capacity co~it- <br />ments (seasonal, monthly, unit purchase), <br />and differing points of delivery to <br />Western's system. <br /> <br /> <br />The replacement resources w~re <br />first analyzed using a levelized-cost : <br />screening tool to demonstrate the s~reen- <br />ing process which Western will use ~o <br />reduce the number of alternatives sdected <br />for the integrated analysis. For the proof- <br />of-concept analysis, the detailed int~grated <br />system analysis was next prepared for all <br />of the replacement alternatives. A jbase <br />case model was prepared, representing <br />the interconnected system with no te- <br />, <br />placement power resource, <br /> <br />III <br /> <br />Then, integrated analysis cas~s were <br />prepared for each of the five repla~ement <br />resource alternatives, assuming all i <br />Western's customers took a proportional <br />share of the replacement resource. I The <br />, <br />results of the integrated analysis ill~strated <br />the evaluation process, demonstraWd the <br /> <br />use ofthe modeling tools, and confirmed <br />that the recommended analysis produces <br />reasonable results. <br /> <br /> <br />Results of the proof-of-concept <br />analyses were presented in several <br />formats to aid in evaluation, and to demon- <br />strate the range of criteria that can be <br />used to measure the alternatives, The <br />ability of the modeling tools to accommo- <br />date the varying needs of Western and its <br />diverse customer base were also demon- <br />strated. <br /> <br />The economic impact of the replace- <br />ment resource on Western's customers <br />was determined first. This information <br />was then used to develop an adjusted <br />levelized-cost analysis, which was pre- <br />sented in both tabular form and graphi- <br />cally. A sample electric rate analysis was <br />also provided to illustrate the methodology <br />for calculating the rate impact for custom- <br />ers purchasing replacement power. <br /> <br />Finally, a methodology was described <br />to address risks through sensitivity analy- <br />sis, and the results of the overall proof-of- <br />concept analysis. were interpreted and <br />summarized as a list of "fmdings." <br /> <br />Findings <br /> <br />The proof-of-concept analysis <br />demonstrated feasible methods, techniques <br />and tools for Western to use in evaluating <br />and acquiring replacement resources. <br />While the methods identified were demon- <br />strated primarily with power purchases, <br />these same methods and modeling tools <br />will be applicable for analyzing alternatives <br />such as resource lease or build options for <br />longer-term future replacements. <br /> <br />Additional findings include: <br /> <br />, Given the complexities of purchase and <br />sale transactions in the power market, a <br />