Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />EP Act, offers guidelines that Western will <br />apply in evaluating replacement resources. <br />To the extent that Western acquires <br />replacement power at the request of <br />individual customers, this policy will also <br />provide consistency between Western's <br />replacement power acquisition process <br />and the customer's IRP, <br /> <br />Key Policy Issues <br /> <br />After the public comments received <br />during the public consultation phase of the <br />Replacement Resources Process were <br />analyzed, certain fundamental policy <br />issues were addressed by Western as part <br />of the process of developing a useful and <br />focused Methods Report, <br /> <br />STRATEGIC GOALS: The primary concern <br />to Western's SLCMP customers will be <br />the cost competitiveness of potential <br />replacement resources relative to other <br />power options available in the new, more <br />competitive, wholesale power market. <br />The primary goal of the Replacement <br />Resources Process and this Methods <br />Report is to comply with requirements of <br />Section 1809 of the Grand Canyon <br />Protection Act that called for "establish- <br />ing methods to acquire replacement <br />power resources at a cost to its firm <br />power customers that is competitive in <br />the market." Western's Principles of IRP <br />also dictate that potential replacement <br />resources be evaluated in a fair and <br />equitable manner. <br /> <br />In identifYing acceptable methods for <br />acquiring replacement power, the analysis <br />maintained a focus on the following <br />strategic goals: <br /> <br />, comply with the GCP Act; <br /> <br />comply with the CRSP Act and related <br />legal mandates; <br /> <br />adhere to Western's Principles of IRP; <br />and <br /> <br />obtain least -cost replacement power for <br />Western's customers. <br /> <br />OTHER RELATED ISSUES: Other key policy <br />issues that were considered in the analysis <br />included: <br /> <br />the potential for future resource integra- <br />tion with Hoover Dam and Power <br />Plant; <br /> <br />, the nature of the resource evaluation <br />criteria regarding acceptable technolo- <br />gIes; <br /> <br />. the possible treatment of external costs, <br />or externalities, in the evaluation <br />process; <br /> <br />, the treatment of transmission-related <br />commitments and constraints; <br /> <br />the consideration of energy efficiency <br />efforts by Western for loads under its <br />control; <br /> <br />, the appropriate planning horizon for <br />consideration of replacement resource <br />options; and <br /> <br />, the level of future public involvement <br />and environmental compliance in the <br />methods implementation stage. <br /> <br />It is possible that additional strategic <br />goals or guidelines for replacement <br />resource acquisition may be considered in <br />the future based on other agency or <br />departmental policy mandates. <br /> <br />','",,\ <br />. <br /> <br />~ TheJH'ima~goalof1he .: <br />-" ~ I< '" "," kr, <br />" "I'ri} ~ A "", <br />. i.ReJ(!aoe~tResources <~ <br />H" 1<~, ' " 'lliO&Et <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />II <br />