Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WESTERN <br />STATES WATER <br /> <br /> <br />n016G~ <br /> <br />September 18, 1992 <br />Issue No. 957 <br /> <br />__i"'--:-.~~:-'-'-'. <br /> <br /> <br />TIlE WEEKLY NEWSLETIER OF TIlE WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL <br /> <br />Creekview Plaza, Suite A-201 I 942 East 7145 So. I Midvale. Utah 84047 I (801) 561-5300 I FAX (801) 255-9642 <br /> <br />editor - Tony Willardson <br />typist - Carrie curvin <br /> <br />chairman - Dave Kennedy <br /> <br />UTIGATION~~RONMENT <br /> <br />executive director - Craig Bell <br /> <br />Wetlands <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated <br />an earlier ruling which held that the Clean Water Act <br />(CWA) does not give EPA jurisdiction to regulate <br />Section 404 dredge and fill activities on isolated <br />intrastate lands (Hoffman Homes Inc. v. EPA, No. 90- <br />3810 (7th Cir., Sept. 4, 1992)). The case involved a <br />wetland area of less than one acre located near <br />Chicago, Illinois, that Hoffman filled to develop a <br />subdivision rNSW #938). In 1988, EPA filed a <br />complaint against Hoffman for developing the wetland <br />without a Section 404 permit. EPA'sChief Judicial <br />Officer ruled that the agency's Section 404 authority <br />extended to the area, and that a Section 404 permit <br />was required for the development to proceed, The <br />Seventh Circuit reversed the EPA ruling on the basis <br />that the agency had no jurisdiction over the isolated <br />wetland area. <br /> <br />EPA petitioned the Seventh Circuit for a rehearing <br />of its decision, The circuit court granted the petition <br />and subsequently vacated its earlier ruling. It also <br />ordered the parties to attempt to settle the matter by <br />negotiation, If a successful settlement is reached, the <br />circuit court is unlikely to issue any formal opinion to <br />replace the vacated one, If no settlement is reached, <br />the court will rehear the case and another opinion <br />will be written, <br /> <br />WATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Drought/Water Banks <br /> <br />Through August 12, California had purchased <br />155,000 acre-feet (AF) of water for its 1992 drought <br />water bank, including 10,000 AF from surface water <br />sources. and the remainder from conservation <br /> <br />measures and ground water. Some 28,000 AF will be <br />used to ensure delta water quality requirements are <br />met, leaving a net supply of 127,000 AF, Of that <br />amount, 83,000 AF has been allocated to agricultural <br />uses, which is almost identical to the amount <br />allocated last year. Another 26,000 AF has been <br />allocated to urban uses, and the remaining 18,000 AF <br />to the California Department of Fish and Game. The <br />basic purchase price in 1992 has been $50 an acre- <br />foot, with carriage losses through the Delta to meet <br />water quality requirements and other purchase costs <br />adding $17 per acre-foot and administration expenses <br />another $5, for a total of $72 per acre-foot. <br /> <br />Last year, the state's basic purchase price was <br />$125 per acre-foot, other costs added $45 per acre- <br />foot, and administration another $5, for a total of $175 <br />per acre-foot. In 1991 the state purchased 820,000 <br />AF, Over half of that amount came from agreements <br />signed early in the year by farmers to fallow lands or <br />forego irrigation, The state acquired 420,000 AF from <br />fallowing over 166,000 acres, mostly corn (59,276 <br />acres), wheat (43,584), pasture (16,188), alfalfa <br />(10,219), sugar beets (9,951) and rice (8,180), Of the <br />remaining 400,000 AF acquired, 260,000 AF was <br />ground water and 140,000 AF surface water. Delta <br />water quality requirements and other adjustments left <br />a net water supply of 660,000 AF. Agricultural users <br />purchased 83,000 AF, and urban users 307,000 AF. <br />The Metropolitan Water District of Southern Calffornia <br />purchased 215,000 AF, the Kern County Water <br />Agency in Bakersfield 53,797 AF, the City of San <br />Francisco 50,000 AF, the Santa Clara Valley Water <br />District 19,750 AF, the Alameda County Water District <br />14,800 AF, the Contra Costa Water District 6,717 AF <br />and other municipal water districts purchased smaller <br />amounts. The Westlands Water District in the <br />southern San Joaquin Valley purchased 13,820 AF for <br />agricultural use and the nearby Dudley Ridge Water <br />District 13,805 AF. Of note, the state acquired <br />