|
<br />WESTERN
<br />STATES WATER
<br />
<br />
<br />n016G~
<br />
<br />September 18, 1992
<br />Issue No. 957
<br />
<br />__i"'--:-.~~:-'-'-'.
<br />
<br />
<br />TIlE WEEKLY NEWSLETIER OF TIlE WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL
<br />
<br />Creekview Plaza, Suite A-201 I 942 East 7145 So. I Midvale. Utah 84047 I (801) 561-5300 I FAX (801) 255-9642
<br />
<br />editor - Tony Willardson
<br />typist - Carrie curvin
<br />
<br />chairman - Dave Kennedy
<br />
<br />UTIGATION~~RONMENT
<br />
<br />executive director - Craig Bell
<br />
<br />Wetlands
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has vacated
<br />an earlier ruling which held that the Clean Water Act
<br />(CWA) does not give EPA jurisdiction to regulate
<br />Section 404 dredge and fill activities on isolated
<br />intrastate lands (Hoffman Homes Inc. v. EPA, No. 90-
<br />3810 (7th Cir., Sept. 4, 1992)). The case involved a
<br />wetland area of less than one acre located near
<br />Chicago, Illinois, that Hoffman filled to develop a
<br />subdivision rNSW #938). In 1988, EPA filed a
<br />complaint against Hoffman for developing the wetland
<br />without a Section 404 permit. EPA'sChief Judicial
<br />Officer ruled that the agency's Section 404 authority
<br />extended to the area, and that a Section 404 permit
<br />was required for the development to proceed, The
<br />Seventh Circuit reversed the EPA ruling on the basis
<br />that the agency had no jurisdiction over the isolated
<br />wetland area.
<br />
<br />EPA petitioned the Seventh Circuit for a rehearing
<br />of its decision, The circuit court granted the petition
<br />and subsequently vacated its earlier ruling. It also
<br />ordered the parties to attempt to settle the matter by
<br />negotiation, If a successful settlement is reached, the
<br />circuit court is unlikely to issue any formal opinion to
<br />replace the vacated one, If no settlement is reached,
<br />the court will rehear the case and another opinion
<br />will be written,
<br />
<br />WATER RESOURCES
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />Drought/Water Banks
<br />
<br />Through August 12, California had purchased
<br />155,000 acre-feet (AF) of water for its 1992 drought
<br />water bank, including 10,000 AF from surface water
<br />sources. and the remainder from conservation
<br />
<br />measures and ground water. Some 28,000 AF will be
<br />used to ensure delta water quality requirements are
<br />met, leaving a net supply of 127,000 AF, Of that
<br />amount, 83,000 AF has been allocated to agricultural
<br />uses, which is almost identical to the amount
<br />allocated last year. Another 26,000 AF has been
<br />allocated to urban uses, and the remaining 18,000 AF
<br />to the California Department of Fish and Game. The
<br />basic purchase price in 1992 has been $50 an acre-
<br />foot, with carriage losses through the Delta to meet
<br />water quality requirements and other purchase costs
<br />adding $17 per acre-foot and administration expenses
<br />another $5, for a total of $72 per acre-foot.
<br />
<br />Last year, the state's basic purchase price was
<br />$125 per acre-foot, other costs added $45 per acre-
<br />foot, and administration another $5, for a total of $175
<br />per acre-foot. In 1991 the state purchased 820,000
<br />AF, Over half of that amount came from agreements
<br />signed early in the year by farmers to fallow lands or
<br />forego irrigation, The state acquired 420,000 AF from
<br />fallowing over 166,000 acres, mostly corn (59,276
<br />acres), wheat (43,584), pasture (16,188), alfalfa
<br />(10,219), sugar beets (9,951) and rice (8,180), Of the
<br />remaining 400,000 AF acquired, 260,000 AF was
<br />ground water and 140,000 AF surface water. Delta
<br />water quality requirements and other adjustments left
<br />a net water supply of 660,000 AF. Agricultural users
<br />purchased 83,000 AF, and urban users 307,000 AF.
<br />The Metropolitan Water District of Southern Calffornia
<br />purchased 215,000 AF, the Kern County Water
<br />Agency in Bakersfield 53,797 AF, the City of San
<br />Francisco 50,000 AF, the Santa Clara Valley Water
<br />District 19,750 AF, the Alameda County Water District
<br />14,800 AF, the Contra Costa Water District 6,717 AF
<br />and other municipal water districts purchased smaller
<br />amounts. The Westlands Water District in the
<br />southern San Joaquin Valley purchased 13,820 AF for
<br />agricultural use and the nearby Dudley Ridge Water
<br />District 13,805 AF. Of note, the state acquired
<br />
|