Laserfiche WebLink
<br />WATER OUAUlY <br /> <br />Water Quality Standardsllndian Tribes as States <br /> <br />Albuquerque officials have estimated that the cost <br />to treat the city's effluent to meet the Pueblo of <br />Isleta's new water quality standards, together with the <br />lower limits on several pollutants recently established <br />by EPA, could be upwards of $250M, Clean Water <br />Act Section 518 allows Indian tribes to be treated as <br />states for many purposes under the Act, including for <br />the establishment of water quality standards. The <br />Pueblo of Isleta, located downstream on the Rio <br />Grande from Albuquerque, has been approved for <br />treatment as a state under the law, The pueblo <br />adopted water quality standards earlier this year <br />which are currently under review by EPA. They would <br />require water discharged into the Rio Grande in <br />proximity to the pueblo to meet "primary contact," or <br />drinking water quality standards. Although <br />Albuquerque's discharge into the river constitutes a <br />very small percentage of the river's flow, in the past <br />Pueblo officiais have been concerned about its effect <br />on the quality of water in the river, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The EPA requirements will account for $60-100M <br />of the $250M, with the remainder attributable to the <br />Pueblo's standards, according to city officials. The <br />city's discharge permit expired approximately one <br />year ago. EPA has proposed a new draft permit <br />including stricter limits for certain pollutants, but the <br />Pueblo's standards have not yet been written into the <br />permit. Some efforts to discuss Albuquerque's <br />compliance with Isleta's standards have been <br />attempted. Albuquerque officials have opined that <br />some issues related to the municipality's compliance <br />with the Pueblo's standards may be decided in court. <br /> <br />WATER RESOURCES/WATER QUAUlY <br /> <br />Montana/State Water Planning <br /> <br />The Montana Department and Board of Natural <br />Resources and Conservation is holding public <br />hearings on the adoption of a section of the Montana <br />state water plan relating to 'integrated water quality <br />and quantity management." The purpose is to solicit <br />final public comment before the plan section is <br />approved by the Board and submitted to the <br />legislature. The proposed section states that "it is the <br />policy and practice of the State of Montana to <br /> <br />integrate the management of water use and the <br />protection of water quality...." Implementation of the_ <br />policy is to be accomplished by managing surfac <br />and ground water quantity and quality as a <br />integrated resource, Further, 'implementation shall <br />promote the protection and sustainability of the <br />resource for existing and future uses consistent with <br />the existing legal and regulatory framework,' <br /> <br />The document sets forth a number of issues, <br />options and recommendations, They involve the <br />coordination of permitting, administrative coordination, <br />cumulative impacts of water use permits on water <br />quality, the viability of the Montana reservation <br />process for water quality purposes, basin closure, <br />non-point source POllution, control of ground water <br />areas, long-term planning related to ground water <br />problems, well construction enforcement, unplugged <br />bore holes, protection from mining impacts, and <br />information/education. Following the statement of <br />each of these issues is a description of both the <br />options recommended and those considered but not <br />recommended, The proposed plan addition also <br />contains a section on implementation describing <br />necessary legislative and administrative actions, as <br />well as financial requirements and funding strategies, <br />An appendix is included that discusses current tools <br />to facilitate water quality considerations in wate,r. <br />quantity allocation and water quantity consideration <br />in water quality protection. Comments and questions <br />about the plan section may be directed to Judy <br />Grubber of the Water Resources Division in Helena at <br />(406) 444-4247, <br /> <br />Schedule of Meetinas <br /> <br />Wednesdav. October 7. 1992 <br />Management Subcommittee <br />WGA/WSWC Steering Group <br /> <br />6:30 p.m, <br />7:30 p.m, <br /> <br />Thursdav. October 8. 1992 <br />FERC Subcommittee <br />Legal Committee <br />Water Quality Committee <br />Executive Committee <br />Water Resources Committee <br />Social Hour <br /> <br />7:00 a.m. <br />8:00 a.m. <br />10:20 p.m. <br />12:40 p,m. <br />1:30 p.m. <br />6:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Fridav. October 9, 1992 <br />Water Policy Seminar Subcommittee <br />108th Quarterly Meeting <br /> <br />7:35 a.m. <br />8:30 a.m, <br /> <br />The WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL is an organization of representatives appointed by the Governo':iA <br />of member states - Alaska, Arizona, Califomia, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Nort:W <br />Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming, and associate member state Oklahoma <br />