My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02457
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02457
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:37:02 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:07:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.400
Description
McElmo Creek Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
7
Date
5/1/1981
Title
Draft Status Report - McElmo Creek Unit
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />CHAPTER I II <br /> <br />PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT <br /> <br />From February 1978 through February 1981 several planning team <br /> <br />and public meetings were held to identify and review problems and issues <br /> <br />in the areas of water resources, land resources, environment, social and <br /> <br />economic factors, and public participation. At these meetings, problems <br /> <br />and issues identified by the subteams and the public were reviewed by the <br /> <br />planning team. <br /> <br />The public involvement on this unit was implemented in stages. The <br /> <br />initial stage was designed to present general information on the unit and <br /> <br />the salinity problem to local people. Newspapers, radio, and displays <br /> <br />were used to disseminate information. <br /> <br />The next stage provided Water and Power with personal contact <br /> <br />with the public through open meetings. This time was used to discuss <br /> <br />the project individually with people, while at the same time exploring <br /> <br />ideas and concepts that could be used in formulating the first set of <br /> <br />alternatives. <br /> <br />Based on these discussions, the planning teams and members of the <br /> <br />general public subsequently reviewed the alternatives. Some alternatives <br /> <br />were eliminated at this time because they were not workable. The remain- <br /> <br />ing alternatives were refined and presented to the public through the <br /> <br />newspapers and public meetings. The feedback received from these meet- <br /> <br />ings was reviewed, and the most logical remaining alternatives were <br /> <br />identified. The recomendations of the planning team and the public were <br /> <br />used to help determine the alternatives currently being considered bv <br /> <br />Water and Power for feasibility level study. <br /> <br />ment, <br /> <br />the general public will be kept <br /> <br />In future p(N{f4~~ve- <br /> <br />informed of the unit's progress <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.