My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02437
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02437
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:36:49 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:06:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Issues
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1982
Author
West. Sys. Coord. Co
Title
Western Systems Coordinating Council Ten-Year Coordinated Plan Summary 1982 - 1991
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1982-1991 NUCLEAR AND COAL ADDITIONS -- MW <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />60 <br /> <br />The commercial operations dates of Diablo Canyon Units 1 and 2 <br />(2190 MW) have once again been delayed. Currently Unit 1 is scheduled for <br />operation in August 1982 and Unit 2 is scheduled for operation in May <br />1983. Units 1 and 2 have been delayed over a year since the last report. <br />The continued delay of these units has had a significant impact on the <br />fossil fuel requirements in Northern California as these two units have <br />the capability Df annually displacing 18 million barrels of oil. <br /> <br />If California utilities are unable to obtain licenses and <br />operate the two nuclear units (Diablo Canyon Unit 1 and San Onofre Unit 2) <br />which are scheduled for operation in 1982, oil-burn requirements will <br />probably, increase by nearly 50,000 barrels per day. <br /> <br />Lead times for the various types of thermal generation additions <br />have increased significantly since 1967 as shown below. <br /> THERMAL GENERATION LEAD TIME -- MONTHS <br />Generation <br />Type 1967 1972 1975 1976 1977 -81 <br />Nuclear 78 120 120-144 120-168 120-183 <br />Coal 66 96 72-114 76-125 76-134 <br />Oil and Gas 54 78 <br />Combined Cycle N.A. 60 36-88 48-94 54-95 <br />Combustion Turbine 18 24 36-74 38-86 32-81 <br /> <br />Anticipated lead times have not increased significantly since <br />1977. The wide ranges reported for 1975, 1976 and 1977-81 are a <br />reflection of the different state regulatory processes within the WSCC <br />region. The upper end of these ranges is due in part to the lengthy <br />California regulatory process. Lead times for "Oil and Gas" are not <br />tabulated beyond 1972 as they are no longer considered a viable option <br />under the Nation's energy plan for oil and gas conservation. The last new <br />base load conventional oil-fired unit planned for the region was placed in <br />service during 1978. <br /> <br />The net generation additions (45,680 MW) planned for the <br />1982-1991 period include a net 34,785 MW of base load nuclear and <br />coal-fired generation. The table below provides the current status of <br />these nuclear and coal-fired facilities. <br /> <br /> Percent <br /> of <br />Status Nuclear Coal Total Total <br />Under Construction 11,790 8,285 20,075 56.4 <br />Licensing Process 1,275 4,400 5,675 16.0 <br />Planning Phase 0 9,800 9,800 27.6 <br />Total 13,065 22,485 35,550 ' 100.0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.