Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />59 <br /> <br />IMPACT OF LONG LEAD TIMES AND DELAYS <br /> <br />The preceding sections of this report summarize the WSCC Member <br />Systems' coordinated plans for the generation and transmission facilities <br />required to meet the region's projected power requirements reliably and <br />economically during the next ten years. The forecast of future load <br />requirements is the cornerstone upDn which this planning is based. <br />However, future demands for electricity are difficult to project due to <br />the effect of such variables as energy conservation, uncertain economic <br />conditions, the substitution of electric energy for primary fuels and <br />changing energy cost relationships. The 1982 load forecasts for the <br />ten-year period are lower than estimated a year ago thus reducing but not <br />eliminating the adverse impact of delays associated with construction of <br />new generating facilities. Figure 2 on page 16 graphically illustrates <br />the decline in projected firm peak loads over the past decade and <br />demonstrates the planning uncertainties that must be faced in a changing <br />environment. <br /> <br />The prDblems associated with long lead times and unforeseen <br />delays for generating facilities, coupled with the uncertainty that <br />presently exists in predicting future electric power requirements are of <br />major concern to the power industry. Lead times for the construction of <br />power facilities are long compared with the effects of consumer decisions <br />on the demand for electricity. <br /> <br />It is conceivable that future power requirements could be higher <br />than presently projected if the region's economic growth was to exceed <br />current estimates, a significant conversion from primary fuels to electric <br />energy occurred, or conservation efforts were relaxed. The simultaneous <br />occurrence of these events could result in a sudden and significant <br />increase in power requirements above those projected. In the event that <br />power requirements exceed current projections, combustion turbine units <br />would be the only viable option available to meet unplanned near-term (3-6 <br />years) load growth due to the long lead times associated with most other <br />sources of electrical energy. However, this resource type requires oil <br />which is expensive or gas, the use of which may be restricted. In <br />addition, the National Energy Act restricts the construction of new base <br />load generation facilities that utilize gas or oil as the primary fuel. <br />Resources such as nuclear and coal could not be utilized as the current <br />lead times are 10.0 to 15.3 years for nuclear and 6.3 to 11.2 years for <br />coal-fired facilities. <br /> <br />The long lead times and delays can be attributed to the required <br />regulatory approvals, intervention and subsequent court action by <br />environmental groups, voluminous environmental studies, the scarcity of <br />suitable and acceptable plant sites and financial constraints due to lack <br />of timely rate relief and high interest rates. In addition to creating <br />the potential hazard of a power shortage and the degradation of system <br />reliability, the long lead times and delays of proposed facilities may <br />also have a serious impact upon the social and economic well-being of <br />individuals at the customer level. <br />