Laserfiche WebLink
<br />19 <br /> <br />,~~ <br /><':.<i! " <br />t'o- <br />toO <br /> <br />1 critical to wildlife. If those reservoirs had been built by <br /> <br />2 an irrigator, that would have been the only remaining elk calvin! <br /> <br />3 ground in the state of Colorado. We request that the Bureau of <br /> <br />4 Reclamation analyze these reservoirs which are constructed by <br /> <br />'5 the Colorado, Division of Wildlife using the same criteria that <br /> <br />6 have been used for reservoirs proposed to be constructed by <br /> <br />7 irrigators. Concerning Chapter D, all of our discussion is <br /> <br />8 oriented towards Chapter D. We believe that on page A-24 or <br /> <br />9 A-23, that the Bureau of Reclamation has worked with the Coloradc <br /> <br />10 Division of wildlife and especially on the recommendation of <br /> <br />II 16.000 acres of land for mitigation. The statement is made, how- <br /> <br />12 ever, that this is -- that this is consistent with the policy <br /> <br />.- '~"'. <br />\;~:tt... <br /> <br />13 of the state of Colorado and gentlemen, it is not. The Governor <br /> <br />14 of the state of Colorado has proclaimed in his goals and object- <br /> <br />15 ives for Colorado, long range growth Executive Order of SeptembeI <br /> <br />16 of 1976, that agriculture is a renewable resource vital to the <br /> <br />17 state's economy. We must preserve and enhance the agriculture <br /> <br />18 component of our economy, prevent unnecessary conversion of pri- <br /> <br />19 mary agricultural land and water suitable for irrigation. The <br /> <br />20 withdrawal of 16.000 acres on a long-term basis has not been <br /> <br />21 analyzed as to its adverse effects and we request that it be so <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />!" <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br />analyzed. ,ve believe that there are many in opposition in the <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />state of Colorado to present and future irrigation in the state. <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />They cite many environmental reasons for this when in fact they <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />are opposed to irrigation. agriculture, and intend to use the <br /> <br />, , <br />,I <br />