|
<br />~~~~
<br />'>010:',
<br />~~
<br />~~~i;1
<br />-;-::i:>-,.;:i
<br />
<br />
<br />I
<br />~~;
<br />~{i~
<br />
<br />(:::::j~';;:<
<br />
<br />r~
<br />I
<br />W:f~
<br />,,~'
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />!(q,,~,
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />~r~~~
<br />I
<br />
<br />~;.t~~-~
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />'~~~1'';.IfB;;21_~ill~~.t~~ld
<br />
<br />002713
<br />
<br />:~{~
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />ABC LETS 22 NEW PIrlSICAL P-ESEARCH
<br />CONTRACTS, RENEWS 126o~Hi;:r.s
<br />(AEC IJrnauncement - 9/23/62)
<br />The Atomic Energy Commissian has
<br />complete4 negatiations for 22 new
<br />contracts for unclassified physical
<br />research and renewe4l26 .previaus-
<br />ly existing cantra.cts. Of the
<br />$11,21[,,012 tatal value of the 143
<br />contracts, $96'8, U8 is' represente<l
<br />by new contracts and $10,245,894 oy
<br />reilewe4 contracts.
<br />The contracts, generally ma4e for
<br />ane year, are al~arced as pa~t of the
<br />Comroissian'~ policy af assisting an4
<br />ac~eleratin3 r~uearch related to
<br />atomic'energy in educatianal institu~
<br />tiqns and private research labara-
<br />taries, The institutians and the
<br />C<;>mmissian usually share the research
<br />casts,. the, institutians supplying the
<br />furids . an4' s.ervices which' ar<linarily
<br />would be' spent on the progr'lm and t.he
<br />Cotimission supplementing these funds.
<br />Institutions receiving contract
<br />awards in the Missouri Basin ten-
<br />state' Area are as fallows: Colarado
<br />Schoal af Mines, Galden, Cala, (1);
<br />towa State Universitr, Iowa City,
<br />Iowa (1); University of Kansas, Law-
<br />rence, Kansaa (3); KanSas State Uni-
<br />.' v'ersity, Manhattan, Kansas (1); Uni-
<br />''irersitYOf Minnesata, Minneapalis,
<br />Minn. (4); University af Missouri,
<br />Rolla, Mo., (1); University of Neor&s-
<br />ka, Lincaln, Nebr~ (2).
<br />
<br />ELK RIVER DEI10HSTP.ATION
<br />REACTOR PROGRAM PROJECT
<br />(~ederal Register - 11/21/62)
<br />. . Please take natice that, pursuant
<br />to. the provisians .of Paragraph 4.A.
<br />of provisio.nal Operating Authariza-
<br />tion Na.. DPRA-3,Allls-Ch,iIL.ers>Nan-
<br />ufac~uring Company has been author-
<br />.~zed to load fuel andte aperate the
<br />Elk River Reactor located near the
<br />village af El~( ll.iver, !-linne'soto? at
<br />" s.teedy-state pO'ier: lev;ls noteKceed-
<br />ing 58".2 thermal m.egm\rdtt_s :La" the
<br />',manner ,desc.i;'ed.~nd subje.ct ,to. the
<br />"prO"jisions set'(orth iri the 'au.thbri-
<br />zatiar...
<br />
<br />~~~~}
<br />
<br />Based upon reparts af 'inspectian
<br />by a .ept~sentative af the Divisian
<br />of Campli~nce, it is .found that can-
<br />strucf:iari of the facility has been
<br />completed in confarmitY'with tae con-
<br />structiOn autharization, theapplica-
<br />tion, as arr.euded, the technical speci-
<br />ficatians pres~ribed in the authori-
<br />zation,. t:he pro1lisions. of the Act,
<br />and the rt:les and r~gulatiansaf the
<br />Commission.
<br />Notice of issuance of Prol.'isianal
<br />Operating Autho~ization No. DPRA-3
<br />was issued on November 6, 1962.
<br />Dated at Germanto.wn, Md., this 10th
<br />day af November 1962.
<br />For the Atomic Enel:gy Commi.ssi,an.
<br />R. Lowenstein, Director, Division
<br />af Licensing and Regulatian.
<br />
<br />ERITAIN NUCLEAR PLANTS (cant'd' fro p.2)
<br />1963 atamic ener~r would be as cheap
<br />as conventional p,:>wer aad evenl:.ually
<br />would cast less than half. the price
<br />of coal-generated electricity, Re-
<br />vised estimates now ind~cate it will
<br />be at least anather five years'before
<br />electricity producec! by nuclear, re-
<br />actors can compete in cost with coal-
<br />generated "awer.'
<br />Gave~ent credit restrictions
<br />added to the power iridustry'sprab-
<br />lems, . The arigin~l target calling
<br />far a nu,::lear'power output af 6,000
<br />megawat.ts by 1964 was scaled back to
<br />5,000 megawatts by 1968. Estimates
<br />that demand fo,: coal wauldoutpace
<br />supplies <.ndraisethe cali't of can-
<br />.ventional fuels to. the advantage of
<br />nuclear po.w~r prcv~d false. Britain
<br />has a glut of coal; oil stocks are
<br />plentiful, and prices have inciea.sed
<br />comparatively modestly~ 6vers~as
<br />buyers have been slou~r than antic-
<br />ipated ,in placing arders f,:>r nuclear
<br />pOl.rer . stati.ox'J.s?_ - Suo far, -J~ritain has
<br />sold only twq.'An 80 milli.cn dallar
<br />project in Italy is ,due to. start
<br />production next: year and a seco~d
<br />- :ppwer plant, coating 98 milliou. dol-
<br />lara; is being built' for'Japanat
<br />takumura,70 miles nOrth of Tokyo_'
<br />
<br />" 0;
<br />
|