<br />THE ARtzONA REPUBLIC
<br />
<br />CAP/Specl.1 Report 5
<br />
<br />
<br />, T he Central Arizona Project
<br />is among the most expen.
<br />sive federal reclamation
<br />projects ever undertaken, but
<br />Uncle Sam will get much of his
<br />money back.
<br />Congress, in authorizing the
<br />CAP, provided that a large pro-
<br />portion of the money it would
<br />advance for construction would
<br />be returned to the Treasury with
<br />3.342 percent interest.
<br />The 1968 legislation authorized
<br />$832,180,000 for the CAP's main
<br />features and $100 million for
<br />non-Indian irrigation works.
<br />In the 15 years since, because
<br />of increased costs of materials
<br />and labor, the cost of the CAP's
<br />main features has risen to an
<br />estimated $3.5 billion.
<br />The cost of non-Indian irriga-
<br />tion distributions systerns now is
<br />put at $276 million. Spending for
<br />the non-Indian work is just
<br />beginning and will be repaid
<br />without interest.
<br />Nor will non-Indian farmers or
<br />Indians pay intereat on the cost
<br />of the main CAP features. Inter-
<br />eat will be paid by municipal and
<br />industrial-CAP water usera. Con-
<br />gress has left the rate of interest
<br />88 it W.Q.6I in 196&
<br />In October 1983 prices, the
<br />Bureau of Reclamation estimated
<br />the OO8t of the main CAP work at
<br />$2,475,338,000. This does not
<br />include the proposed Plan 6 or
<br />costs for non.lndian irrigation-
<br />water distribution systems.
<br />Of the total cost to date, the
<br />bureau estimates $1,659,433,000,
<br />or 67.1 percent, will have to be
<br />repaid by the Central Arizona
<br />Water Conservation District, the
<br />three-county agency established
<br />for this purpose.
<br />Approximately $52,424,000 of
<br />the project costs will be repaid by
<br />other beneficiaries of the CAP
<br />law, including those in New
<br />Mexico.
<br />The other $763,481,000 will not
<br />have to be repaid because it is
<br />classified as deferred or non."
<br />reimbUl'88.ble.
<br />
<br />Repaying
<br />Uncle
<br />
<br />Water district's share
<br />estimated at $1.6 billion
<br />
<br />Deferred refers to the Indians'
<br />share of CAP costs, which so far,
<br />totals $387,250,000. The money
<br />will remain deferred as long as
<br />the Indians do not sell their
<br />lands.
<br />Non-reimbursable dollars ~
<br />$376,231,000 - are those spent
<br />for flood control, some fish and
<br />wildlife, and recreation.
<br />The oontract ff>>' CAP con_
<br />struction and repayment between
<br />the conservation district and the
<br />Department of the Interior speci.
<br />flee that repayment to the federal
<br />government will begin when the
<br />interior secretary declares the
<br />CAP substantially is complete.
<br />The repayment period is 50
<br />years.
<br />Interest so far on CAP con-
<br />struction costs totals $216,264,-
<br />000.
<br />The Bureau of Reclamation
<br />reported it cannot estimate the
<br />interest over the 50-year repay-
<br />ment period because of uncer.
<br />tainty over which part of the
<br />remaining $3.5 billion will be
<br />reimbursable.
<br />However, Frank Welch, execu-
<br />tive director of Citizens Con-
<br />cerned About the Project, a
<br />Valley ta:r.payers group opposed
<br />
<br />to using federal funds for con-
<br />struction of the CAP, estimated
<br />the interest will bring the total
<br />CAP cost to $5.4 billion.
<br />The conservation district will
<br />have three sources of revenue:
<br />water sales to municipal and
<br />industrial users and non-Indian
<br />farmers, electricity sales and
<br />property taxes.
<br />In ordor to p.y tho con..rva_
<br />tion district's annual obligation,
<br />not including interest, the Bu.
<br />reau of Reclamation estimated
<br />the anticipated revenue from
<br />each of these as follows:
<br />. Water sales: $550,127,000.
<br />Water will be sold to non-
<br />Indian farmers at $2 per acre-
<br />foot, a charge set by the Bureau
<br />.of Reclamation. The bureau
<br />projects these farmers will receive
<br />approximately 29 million acre-
<br />feet of water in the 50-year
<br />repayment period, which means
<br />their total contribution to repay-
<br />ing the costs of the main CAP
<br />features will be $58,704,000.
<br />The conservation district, for
<br />planning purposes, in 1972 set
<br />the price of water at $32.50 per
<br />acre-foot for municipal and in-
<br />dustrial users. Municipal and
<br />industrial users are projected to
<br />
<br />get about 12.1 million acre-feet of
<br />water at a cost of $491,423,000.
<br />. Electricity sales: $917,218,--
<br />000. .
<br />Most of this - $842,809,000 _
<br />will come from sales of power at
<br />the Navajo Generating Station at
<br />Page. Hoover Dam power sales
<br />are expected to contribute $74,-
<br />409,000, starting in 1993.
<br />The law authorizing the CAP
<br />said the CAP will receive power
<br />revenues from the Parker-Davis
<br />Project, too, but the Bureau of
<br />Reclamation reported the rates
<br />for electricity produced by this
<br />project do not provide enough
<br />revenue to help with CAP repay-
<br />ment.
<br />CongreB8 next year will con-
<br />sider a bill that would specify
<br />that 41h mills, or 0.45 of a cent,
<br />for each kilowatt-bour of electric-
<br />ity sold at the Navajo Generating
<br />Station and Hoover Dam go into
<br />the repayment fund.
<br />The Bureau of Reclamation
<br />already has calculated the 4V2
<br />mills into the expected repay.
<br />ment revenues.
<br />The Navajo Generating Station
<br />was built to provide electricity to
<br />pump CAP water.
<br />.-Propol't.y-t.aJ.oe; tl92,088,()()().
<br />The Conservation District has
<br />authority to levy a property tax
<br />of 10 cents per $100 of 8B8eBsed
<br />valuation in the three-county
<br />district: Maricopa, Pinal and
<br />Pima. The current property-tax
<br />levy is 5 cents.
<br />Pam Kohnken, chief of the
<br />contract and repayment branch
<br />for the bureau's Arizona projects
<br />office in Phoenix, said the gov.
<br />ernment is interested only in the
<br />total annual payment. How the
<br />district collects the money_ is up
<br />to its board of directors and .it
<br />could change the price of water
<br />for cities and industries and
<br />change the property-tax rate.
<br />She said when repayment be~
<br />gins, the conservation district
<br />also will have to pay interellt.on
<br />tbe balance of CAP conatnictioA
<br />costs due the government. "
<br />
|