Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Q <br />,., <br />~ '. <br />N <br />M <br />c <br /> <br />Tribes got <br />CAP priority' <br />with pleas in <br />Washington' ' <br /> <br />When water is available be- <br />yond that required for Indian and <br />non-Indian municipal and induS- <br />trial allocation, it will go to non- <br />Indian farmers, <br />During years of Colorado Ri~r <br />water shortage, .. <br />the Interior <br />Department or- <br />dered, Indian <br />and non-Indian <br />municipal and <br />industrial users <br />share a first <br />priority. Re- <br />ductions will be <br />proportional, Andrus <br />based on the amount of water <br />actually delivered in the last non- <br />shortage year. "__, _ <br />Reductions in water to the- <br />eight reservations getting home- <br />lands allocations will occur only <br />after cuts to the five Indian tribes <br />getting irrigation water, <br />The Gila River Indian Reserva- <br />tion, which has the largest Indian <br />allocation, also will have the <br />largest reduction - 25 perceftt. <br />The reduction for the other foUr <br />reservations receiving irrigation <br />water, San Carlos. Papago Chui <br />Chu, Ak-Chin and Salt River will <br />be 10 percent each, ' <br />Indian reservations also are <br />excluded from two limitations <br />imposed on farmers on non- <br />Indian lands. <br />First, farmers on non-Indian <br />lands cannot use CAP water on <br />land that does not have a history <br />of irrigation between 1958 and <br />1968. " <br />The state's Groundwater M....- <br />agement Act said the land aTBo <br />must have been irrigated between <br />1975 and 1980.' <br />Indians can use CAP water to <br />irrigate anywhere on their reser- <br />I vations, regardless of whether the <br />i land has a history of bei;;'!i <br />, irrigated. ' ^ <br />, Second, farmers on non-Indian <br />i lands must forgo pumping "lib <br />'acre-foot of ground water 'fllr <br />each acre-foot of CAP water <br />received. Indians can pump all <br />the water they want, regardless of <br />the amount of CAP water they <br />receive. <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />One major complaint :Of <br />some Arizona Indian tribes <br />is that when it comes \to <br />water, they have been treated <br />unfairly, They took their com- <br />plaint to Washington and got the <br />ear of Secretary of the Interior <br />Cecil Andrus, who in 1980 de' <br />clared this would not happen. in <br />the operation of the CenQ;1'1 <br />Arizona Project.'" <br />When Andrus distributed ~e <br />CAP supply, he ordered that'ln <br />times of Colorado River short- <br />ages, supplying water to Indian <br />farms would have the same <br />priority as supplying non-Indlllll: <br />cities and towns. . <br />In addition, Andrus alloca~ <br />CAP water to eight reservations <br />for what he called tribal home- <br />lands. He gave the homelands <br />water an even higher priority, <br />Non-Indian farmers have the <br />lowest water priority. <br />Andrus allotted 309,828 acre- <br />feet of CAP water each year to 12 <br />Indian reservations. <br />This includes 54,428 acre-feet <br />of water per year for homelands <br />and 255,400 acre-feet per year for <br />irrigation on five reservations. <br />The San Carlos Reservation wlis <br />given both types of allocations; <br />Homelands and irrigation water <br />can be used for any purpose, <br />including agriculture. <br />The non-Indian municipal arid <br />industrial allocation is 640,000 <br />acre-feet of water per year.,..,.' <br />including water expected to be <br />used someday for the production <br />of electricity. <br />