My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02397
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02397
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:36:33 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:05:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.112.A
Description
Central Arizona Project
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/18/1983
Title
Special Report: Central Arizona Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />.,,_.R....IICI~R.I".tlons <br />and wat.r atorage <br /> <br />The long and. . <br /> <br />Just right, too little and too much are the possible <br />water conditions along the Colorado River for <br />the Central Arizona Project. <br />Just right, according to the V,S. Bureau of <br />Reclamation, is a "normal year" and the CAP would <br />get 1.5 million acre-feet of water, its maximum share <br />froJ,l1Arizona's yearly entitlement of 2.8 million acre- <br />feet. <br />In a normal water year. Lake Mead behind Hoover <br />Dam would be more than half full, 7.5 million acre- <br />feet" would be avilable for the three Lower Basin <br />state~ - Arizona, California and Nevada - and <br />1.5 million acre-feet would be available for Mexico. <br />Too little would be a "shortage year," <br />.)n a shortage year, 6.4 million acre-feet would be <br />available for the Lower Basin states, 1.5 million acre- <br />feet for Mexico and Lake Mead would be less than <br />halHul!. <br />Arizona would get 1.7 million acre-feet, of which <br />400,000 would be for the CAP, <br />Too much would be a "surplus year." <br />: ,In a surplus year, such as 1983, more than <br />7,5 million acre-feet would be available for the Lower <br />Basin states, Mexico would get 1.5 million acre-feet, <br />piUs a share of floodwater, and Lake Mead would spill <br />excess water. Arizona would get its 2.8 million acre- <br />feet plus half of the surplus, and the CAP would get <br />almost 2.2 million acre-feet. I <br /> <br />. . . the short of it <br /> <br />By the reckoning of all interests, the Colorado <br />River at times will not have enough water to <br />go around to all who have claims on it. <br />When that happens - and no one knows <br />exactly when it will - the Central Adzona <br />Project will be the biggest loser in the Lower <br />Colorado River Basin. <br />There are two reasons for this: <br />. First, the right to surface water is based upon <br />the order in which it was put to use. The CAP's <br />claim was made after almost all others. The date <br />of the CAP's water right is Sept. 30, 1968, the day <br />President Lyndon Johnson signed the law <br />authorizing CAP construction, That date is <br />shared by a few other Arizona users along the <br />Colorado River. <br />,./"i-Second, the uCalifornia guarantee/' part of <br />,'the 1968 law, says that when too little water is <br />'~available, "diversions, , . for the Central Arizona <br />roject shall be so limited as to assure the <br />vailability of water, . . in the state of California." <br />i Hence, not only will the CAP be the last to get <br />~ater, but in years when Colorado River water is <br />in short supply, California will get its 4.4 million <br />acre-feet before the CAP gets any. <br />, Arizona's congressional delegation did not like <br />. the California guarantee, but it was the price to <br />get California supllort for the CAP law. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.