Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ing to $2,624.91 was reconciled to the amount directly 'confirmed by <br />that depository. <br />The financial position of the Admlll1stration at October 31 for the <br />past two years is expressed In the following schedule: <br /> <br />ARKANSAS RIVER COMP..\CT ADMINISTRATION <br />Lamar, Colorado <br /> <br />Assets <br />Cash in bank...._ <br />Equipment '(portable typewriter) <br /> <br />Comparative Balance Sheets <br />October 31, October 31, <br />1951 1950 <br />"..$2,624,91 $1,]86,27 <br />9250 <br /> <br />Increase <br />$1,2]8,64 <br />92.50 <br /> <br />Total A$cts <br /> <br />Capital <br />Unexpended funJ hdallc.:: <br />Expcnded fund habncc for <br /> <br />..$2,717.41 <br /> <br />$1,386.27 <br /> <br />$1,3)1.14 <br /> <br />..,S::,62491 <br />l'lp:ipmL'l1l._ 92.50 <br /> <br />$L386.27 <br /> <br />SI,2)8,64 <br />()~. 'in <br /> <br />T:lt;t! Capital on.. <br /> <br />,,2,710-11 $1,3,",,27 $1,3,;1.1-1 <br /> <br />Special Comments <br /> <br />In view of the $.\3.D.:.:. revenue re(I:.'iwd frum thl:.': twu St<l.te.:', <br />the approval of the 19H-1952 budget in the Representatives' Meeting <br />of August 4, 1950 (refer to second paragr;lpn on page No.3 of last <br />year"s audit report), it appears said estimate of expenditures amounting <br />to $5,000.00 was subsequently considered void. Because of the absence <br />of a corrected budget for the fiscal year 1951-1952 (July I, 1951 to <br />June 30, 1952) tnc prublem of comparing- rdated disbursements \).'ith <br />a budget has been discussed at length with the Se..::rt:tary-Trcasurer of <br />the Administration. We have therefore decided to submit ht':rcv....ith for <br />your a.pproval a cumpari.,on of expenditures from July I, 1951 to Octo- <br />ber 31, 1951 with a related four months portion of the revised budget <br />-for th-e period July-I,-r95Ttii]ullc)0;-19.)), -;,pprovi'd-15Y-thc- Rcprc-- <br />sentatives in the Meeting or Octoher 30, 1951 (Preliminary draft). <br /> <br />15 <br />