Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. .,-~: - <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />b. I the event 200,000,000 b';,1 of excess is not <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br />.. <br /> <br />generated at Hoover in any contract year, a banking arrangement <br /> <br />- <br />will be established whereby Arizona may accunulate a right, not <br />to exceed a three-year entitlement,' of said surplus energy <br />(600,000,000 kwh naximum). <br /> <br />. <br />c. Balance of Hoover surplus energy generation to <br /> <br /> <br />be divided equally between the State of Arizona, the.State of <br /> <br />Nevada and the California allottees~ <br /> <br />" <br />r <br /> <br />,. .-i. <br />7. Non-federal-funding for the upratings will be <br /> <br />shared equally between the State of Arizona, the State of Nevada <br /> <br />and the California entities which share the additional capacity, <br /> <br />8. Western should carryforward with its present <br />marketing plans for the Parker-Dav~s Project as outlined in its <br /> <br />-, <br /> <br />August 1982 proposed criteria. <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />9. Thirty-year Hoover contracts with an appropriate <br />reevaluation made of available energy generation at discrete time <br />intervals beyond the initial 20-year period. If' such reeval- <br />uation justifies a change in the total project firm energy from <br />the 4,5 billion kwh, then such change shall be bOl~e proportion- <br />ately by all parties based on their firm energy allocation from <br /> <br />the project. <br /> <br />- <br />~ <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />v- <br />-I;' <br />