My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02323
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02323
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:36:12 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:02:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8443
Description
Narrows Unit
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
11/3/1975
Author
Regional Landowners
Title
Abandonment of the Narrows Dam Project in Preference to a Total River Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />O,..,..,.~ <br />..;J{ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />7a. Railroad Relocation problems <br /> <br />Since there is now a major railroad line within three to five miles <br /> <br />of the proposed relocation, the proposed line would constitute a duplica- <br /> <br />tion of facilities. There would be no added service to the area because <br /> <br />there are now no depots on either of these railroads along this section <br /> <br />of their lines. The duplication of facilities would only add to the cost <br /> <br />to the public. <br /> <br />We understand that the plan is to close many of the county roads <br /> <br />in the Wiggins area where the railroad would cross. This would make <br /> <br />access very difficult if not impossible for many of the farmers and resi- <br /> <br />dents of the area. <br /> <br />During this time of recession we can't help but question the advis- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ability of indebting ourselves more for a project that is being planned <br /> <br />at the wrong site. Isn't the Bureau of Reclamation human enough to admit <br /> <br />that a mistake has been made, and even though the money has been allocated, <br /> <br />that it has been allocated for the wrong dam? In time of a money shortage <br />shouldn't the funds be spent where they will do the most good instead of <br /> <br />trying to save face qy going ahead with a project that is a mistake? Why <br /> <br />not build. the dam upstream or have a series of smaller dams on the Bijou, <br /> <br /> <br />Kiowa. Beaver and Wildcat streams to provide flood and erosion control? <br /> <br />We feel that a time when production of food is becoming so vital is not <br /> <br />the time to take good farm land out of production. Many of the families <br /> <br />involved with both the Narrows Dam and the railroad relocation have boys <br /> <br />growing up who are potential famers. Are we going to deny them land to <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />start their own farms or to carry on the family farm? The productive land <br />that would be lost can never be replaced I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.