My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02305
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:36:06 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.106
Description
Animas-La Plata
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
12/1/1994
Author
Bookman-Edmonston
Title
Economic Impact Study - Animas-La Plata and Colorado Ute Water Rights Settlement Act
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />government for evaluation of water projects which limits benefits to consideration <br />of only the national economic development. <br /> <br />~ There exist special benefits important to the local area in addition to the use of ALP <br /> <br /> <br />water supply to solve the Indian water rights issues for the Tribes. The benefit-cost <br /> <br /> <br />analysis takes into account all the benefits that accrue to the project area including <br /> <br /> <br />the secondary benefits associated with construction and development of the project. <br /> <br />~ This economic analysis of the Project considering changes to household income <br /> <br /> <br />which accrue to the region show that the Project is economically feasible. The total <br /> <br /> <br />income benefits to the region from ALP would be $74.8 million per year. Direct <br /> <br /> <br />benefit-cost ratio of 1.66 and a total benefit-cost ratio of 2.44 are very respectable <br /> <br /> <br />ratios for a water resource development project. These ratios are higher than those <br /> <br /> <br />considered by Congress at the time of authorization of ALP in 1968. While higher <br /> <br /> <br />than what Reclamation is currently showing, using its restricted guidelines, these <br /> <br /> <br />ratios represent a true picture of the economic benefit that the construction of ALP <br /> <br /> <br />and fulfillment of the Settlement Act would bring to the region. <br /> <br />~ An analysis based on change in total regional output has a direct benefit-cost ratio <br />of 3.50 and a total benefit-cost ratio of 5.17. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />The Animas-La Plata Participating Project (ALP) was authorized as one of five western <br />Colorado River Storage Project Participating Projects in the Colorado River Basin Projects <br />Act of 1968. The principal purpose of ALP is to furnish water for irrigation and municipal <br />and industrial use in southwestern Colorado and in northwestern New Mexico. Prior to the <br />initiation of Project construction following completion of the Definite Plan Report in 1979, <br />the Southern Ute and Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribes entered negotiations with the <br />Department of the Interior, the states of Colorado and New Mexico, and Colorado and New <br />Mexico non-Indian water users in an attempt to resolve their water rights under the Winters <br />Doctrine. These negotiations led to the Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Final Settlement <br />Agreement which was signed December 10, 1986. On November 3, 1988, Congress passed <br /> <br />1-2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.