Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />SECTION 1 <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />. The Animas-La Plata Participating Project (ALP) is a keystone in the settlement of <br />the Southern Ute and Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribes water rights litigation in the <br />southwestern Colorado and northwestern New Mexico region. Failure to complete <br />ALP could cause major disruptions to the economy of the non-Indians in the region <br />should the Tribes' Winter Doctrine water rights claims be litigated, approved, and <br />the water put to use by the Tribes. <br /> <br />v-- <br /> <br />. Based on federal promises included in the Court ratified Settlement Agreement and <br />decree, both Indian Tribes agreed to forego their senior water rights claims on many <br />streams that cross or abut their Reservations in exchange for the United States <br />constructing ALP and the Dolores Project. Failure of the United States to fulfill its <br />commitments under the Agreements creates a potential liability to the United States, <br />the state of Colorado, and local residents millions of dollars of litigation expenses. <br /> <br />. The Colorado Ute Water Rights Settlement has brought an era of prosperity to the <br />Tribes and cooperative and cordial relations with the non-Indian citizens of <br />southwest Colorado and northwest New Mexico. Failure to build the ALP could <br />materially jeopardize these important social benefits. <br /> <br />. The Colorado Ute Water Rights Settlement has made it possible for the United States <br />Fish and Wildlife Service, Reclamation, the states of Colorado and New Mexico, and <br />four Indian Tribes (the Ute Mountain Ute, the Southern Ute, the Jicarilla Apache <br />Indian Tribes, and the Navajo Nation) to cooperate in the recovery of the Colorado <br />squawfish in the San Juan basin. Failure to build ALP would seriously jeopardize <br />this important environmental step forward. <br /> <br />. The total benefit-cost ratio of ALP has been understated by Reclamation in prior <br />analyses. This is primarily due to the methodology established by the federal <br /> <br />1-1 <br />