Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4-16 <br /> <br />Chapter 4 - Reallocations <br /> <br />Table 4-9 <br />Comparison of Alternatives to Obtain User Cost <br /> <br />Item Cost <br />Lost Hydropower Benefits $3,339,000 <br />Lost Hvdropower Revenues $1,867,000 <br />Replacement Cost of Hvdropower $3,339,000 <br />Maximum Costs Associated with Lost Flood Control $3,856,111 <br />Updated Cost of Storaqe $8,968,692 <br /> <br />Based on this analysis, the updated cost of storage governs the cost of storage to the user. <br />This is not unusual. While it can be costly and time consuming to compute the other costs, <br />it is necessary.) <br /> <br />5. Test of Financial Feasibili tv. (Compare the cost of the Federally <br />reallocated storage to the most likely alternative determined in above paragraph 3b. The <br />comparison should be based on the appropriate interest rate and repayment period and <br />take into consideration all costs the user would incur to obtain comparable quantity and <br />quality of water to the same location; i.e., consider treatment and transmission costs if <br />significantly different.) <br /> <br />Exarnp~e. As a test of financial feasibility, the annual cost of <br />the rE~allocated storage (determined in paragraph 4f), is compared <br />to th8 annual cost of the most likely, least costly, alternative <br />that would provide an equivalent quality and quantity of water <br />which the local interests would undertake in absence of utilizing <br />the Federal project. (This example is from the "Integrated Storage <br />Reallocation Report and Environmental Assessment for Stockton Lake, <br />Missouri", prepared by the Kansas City District, August 1993.) <br />Table 4-10 presents the cost of water supply storage space from <br />Stockton Lake expressed as an annual charge using an 8.25 percent <br />interest rate amortized over the remaining 77 year project life <br />(100 year life from date first project purpose placed in operation, <br />(factor 0.0826847), plus annual operation, maintenance, and major <br />replacement cost (OM&R) costs for the storage. The table also <br />presents the estimated annual cost for the most likely non-Federal <br />alternative, Lake Webster West, a single purpose water supply lake <br />located about 10 miles east of Springfield, Missouri. Lake Webster <br />West would have an estimated dependable yield of 30 MGD with a 2% <br />chance of shortage. The cost is expressed as an estimated annual <br />charge using an 8.25 percent interest rate and a 77 year project <br />life. <br />