My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02257
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02257
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:35:40 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:00:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8282.200.10.D.2
Description
UCRBRIP
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1991
Author
CWCB
Title
UCRBRIP Program Board Memos Item 19 Transcription
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Jencsok <br /> <br />Meyring <br /> <br />Smith? <br /> <br />Jencsok <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />I am not convinced. I think the Service biologist, <br />and I will let John speak to that too. They maintain <br />that it doesn't work and they have given us <br />some reasons, I am not that much-we <br />to say that is does or doesn't so far. I think there <br />has got to be something out there that is more <br />analytical than simply a biologists' word, may not be <br />but something else it may be <br />together with some other methods or professional <br />judgment I don't know at this time that is why <br /> <br />David <br /> <br />I'm really concerned over that-the method I stated <br />before, I'm not convinced that the amount of water in <br />the river as I am the temperature regime. I don't <br />think they have ever adequately addressed it and yet <br />they turn around and tell us this is the best fishery <br />known for the existing fish and I have seen that <br />river next to being dry depth in late fall and I <br />think they are using-well they just don't have <br />adequate information to ask this Board to deliver <br />water to the stateline and I just-I think that we <br />have to have some factual information. <br /> <br />This issue with respect to delivering water to <br />stateline-one thing we need to all recognize is that <br />under our compact contribution there will be some <br />water going out. We simply are not entitled under <br />the view that 22 of the 1948 Upper Basin compact <br />completely used the water that is originating in <br />Colorado. We have done some studies to show what the <br />average yield is of the various basins, the mainstem, <br />, Yampa, White and so on and under any kind of <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.