Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Sheftel <br /> <br />Jencsok <br /> <br />Sheftel <br /> <br />Jencsok <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />sufficient progress in this <br />program. I don't think there is to much of an <br />outside <br /> <br />I guess I am very concerned with the extent to which <br />the what you call the nonanalytic or the imperial and <br />biological judgment methodology can go I'm sorry John <br />but in the San Juan's, I believe it was in <br />the draft biological opinion the statement was made <br />that-well we found more young of the year in 87 than <br />any other year we researched 87-88 therefore they <br />need more-sufficiently more water and that left me <br />very-feeling very shaky or empirical method <br />or biological judgment so I am very concerned that <br />the methodology is as good as the biologist. <br /> <br />The biologists feel that they have an reasonable <br />method <br /> <br />I understand there is a difference <br /> <br />I might add that we do not need to reach a decision <br />on this today, I would like some direction from you <br />with respect to the Yampa water availability study <br />but these issues, as I have said we have the small <br />committee that is looking into different methodology <br />different methodologies available so we <br />will be meeting shortly and we can bring back the <br />discussions and let you know what is going on. You <br />do not need to reach a specific decision on that <br />issue today, not decide today one way or the <br />other. <br /> <br />Gene are you convinced that <br />applied to the Yampa? <br /> <br />can not be <br /> <br />10 <br />