Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of viability for irrigation districts and the proposed transfers could easily lead to the demise <br />of agriculture. How 8Je these costs accounted for ill the alternative? What safeguard can be <br />appli~ to avoid this outcome? <br />18. <br /> <br />To fadlltate and preserve lone-term options, water rights <br />acquired under the Fund should be exempted !'rom c1alms of <br />abandonment under Colorado water law. <br />a. Why would the State of Colorado or other water users in the affected <br />river basins want to ~e to this? <br />19. On pages 8 and 9 of the Conceptual Alternative, under the heading "Benefits: <br />is the statement that this alternative proposal has a number of substantial benefits, including <br />Provides the TrIbes with _ter rights and "wet water" on tribal <br />lands. <br />a. Does the Conceptual Alternative contemplate that the Tribes will waive <br />their water rights claims for state water rights of unknown priorities and unla10wn yield? If <br />so, when would the waiver become effective? <br />~es the finality of adjudications and settlements on water <br />courses crossing the re&en'atlons. <br />b. How can the Conceptual Alternative preserve or effect settlements until <br />the Tribes have been provided water equivalent to that which they would have received from <br />the Animas-La Plata Project under the Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement <br />Agreement? <br />AYOlds new project c:onstruc:Uon. <br />c. Without storage to provide the municipal and industrial water the Tribes <br />would have received under the Animas-La Plata Project, how will the Conceptual Altemative <br />avoid new project construction? <br />20. Who will be responsible for: <br />a. repayment of capital costs associated with the delivery of water for New <br />Mexico entities? <br />b. redevelopment of distributioD system to deliver the San Juan Water <br />Supply to the upper area of the Animas River? (Existing diversions are on the Animas) <br />e. operation and maintenance costs associated with delivery and storage in <br />Navajo Lake? <br />d. evaporation depletions created in a lake with a greater surface area? <br />e. allocation of water supply? <br />21. How will the resources of New Mexico be developed and accounted for? Can <br />New Mexico develop its compact allocations, or are we to lose the allocation granted in the <br />Compacts? <br />22. What will be required to comply with NEPA, and how will other mitigation be <br />accomplished? At whose cost? <br />23. Will the opponents agree to not oppose the necessary construction? Will they <br />facilitate any legislation required? <br />24. What is the timing for construction of the facilities to deliver the water needed <br />in the upper reaches of San Juan County? <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />vl/60'd 8S0V 998 ~0~ 1 <br /> <br />S3J~OS3~ l~~nl~N ~O ld30 <br /> <br />CS:91 ~661-~1-1JO <br />