Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />Lake Mead) and detrimental impacts of the same strategy on another <br />parameter (such as total end of study reservoir content) were common. A <br /> <br />number of consistent response patterns were i'dentified and discussed <br /> <br />showing a significant potential for "improved" operation of the reser- <br /> <br />v oi rs . <br /> <br />A wide variety of interests and priorities must be considered in opera- <br /> <br />tion of the Colorado River system and no attempt has been made to per- <br />form economic or legal evaluations of the various strategies. As agreed <br /> <br />at the beginning of the study, no recommendation for an overall "best" <br /> <br />operating. strategy was made. Rather the results of the study should be <br /> <br />used as a tool for assessing the general impacts of different alter- <br />native operating strategies under a variety of hydrologic and develop- <br /> <br />mental scenarios. <br /> <br />.J <br />,: <br /> <br />:, <br />. ~ <br />.. <br /> <br />" <br />'i <br />" <br />:1 <br />.1 <br /> <br />., <br />" <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />, <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />:- ~ ',:::~~..~..".' <br /> <br />'.T<, _ .~~ <br />""--: .' .~' ,. .'.~ <br />" '.' , <br /> <br />:~~-:';.~. ~~-"':f~'::;.'":"~~'~""I":~,:""""':C"'"':-~-;-:~""" <br /> <br />:':,;~""'7:-:.--'~""'-'!,":, ~"~-:--: --~~ ~'~:-:---o.--"" ---:-"""",,,"-:----.--_. .,.~_. <br />