Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~j <br />(: <br />:~:; <br /> <br />Ii" <br />". <br />~, ,.~ <br />:~, <br /> <br />Agricultural Res~ch Service (ARS) and Soil Conservation Service (SCS). (A listofWor~g <br />Group members is also included in Appendix A.) <br /> <br />c <br />F..~ w.':l., <br />,~~ t,.", <br />QO <br />~ <br />t~$ <br /> <br />The Task Force and the Working Group began work immediately after Brownell was sworn in. <br />Two sets of quesqons faced them. One concerned the international legal aspects of water quality <br />differences, and included such questions as- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Is Mexico legally obligated to accept Wellton-Mohawk drainage as part of its <br />treaty allotment? <br /> <br />Is~e U.S. legally justified in limiting the improvement in water quality to salt' <br />ballmce equivalence? <br /> <br />p <br />::~.t! <br />f:~j <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~:~ <br />~<~ <br />;-,j <br /> <br />"~ <br />;) <br />.K$ <br /> <br />Do'Mexican water users have a right to receive water of the same quality as <br />Anierican water users who are served by Imperial Dam?13 <br /> <br />The other set dealt with the means of guaranteeing the quality of water delivered' to MexicQ, <br />whatever the eveptual salinity level-the "technical" solutions. . The short-and long-term <br />measures to be cohsidered were much the same as those that had been presented to President <br />Nixon earlier that year. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />i:~ <br />Q~ <br /> <br />B;! <br />~d <br /> <br />For three weeks ,in September of 1972, the Working Group heard presentations on the <br />international legal iissues and debated the merits of various positions. Then, as Brownell and <br />Eaton noted in a 1975 article, these questions were set aside. 14 Certainly the StateDCi!Partment's <br />desire for a negoti~ted settlement that would avoid the possibility of litigation in an international <br />court played a plU'ti inWs decision, but the orders came from the head of the National Security <br />Council-Henry Kissinger. <br /> <br />.l}~~ <br />....:J <br /> <br />'-i;:.~ <br />f\1 <br /> <br />'~;; ." <br />:;,::i <br />:.;'t <br />(:,;.~ <br /> <br />The National Security Council was the only concerned agency in the Executive Office of the <br />President that was inot represented on the Task Force or Working Group, despite Kissinger's <br />wellcknown interest in' U.S.~Mexican relations. As National Security Advisor; he must have <br />been involved in briefing Nixon for the Echeverria visit and in preparation of the joint <br />communique of June. But his position on the issues and his role were unknown to others in the <br />Executive Office. <br /> <br />bd <br />;.:..'-;: <br /> <br />i1;~z <br />-,':;; <br /> <br />On September 26, the office of Assistant Secretary of the Interior James Smith received a <br />message from the NSC: the salt balance approach of Minute No. 241 was to be an interim <br />solution only. The'final solution would require elimination of the effects of Wellton-Mohawk <br />on salinity levels. IS . Wesley Steiner of Arizona, then Chairman of the Committee of Fourteen, <br />remembers hearing 'the same message from Brownell and Eaton in one of their early meetings <br />with the Committee; during which the word of Kissinger's involvement came out. 16 Butmost <br />members of the Working Group and Task Force remained unaware of the change in policy. <br /> <br /> <br />Kissinger's directive-to eliminate the effects of Wellton-Mohawk on water deliveries to <br />, . <br />Mexico-reduced th~ allowable salinity differential at Morelos Dam to about 100 ppm.(Because <br />all return flows froin the project were being bypassed under Minute No. 241, this was the <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />~-"" <br /> <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />, <br />A <br /> <br />:1 <br /> <br />., <br />, <br />'A <br />~ <br />:'1] <br />!1 <br />~ <br />l <br /> <br />'; <br /> <br />/ ~ <br />'.c i <br />i <br />. 'I <br />.,~ <br />. /j <br />,1 <br /> <br />.'i <br /> <br />-1' 'i <br /> <br />!, <br />; <br /> <br />