My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02128
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02128
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:42 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:55:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.110.60
Description
Colorado River Water Users Association
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/20/1969
Author
CRWUA
Title
Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />RECIPE FOR MAJOR POWER DEVELOPMENT <br />By L. M. ALEXANDER. Associate General Manager <br />Salt River Project. Phoenix, Arizona <br /> <br />Thank you for this opportunity to be here today. I am L. M. Alexander, Associate General <br />Manager of the Salt River Pmject. Today, however, I appear as the Chairman of the multi-utility <br />Steering Committee which is creating the major Navajo Thermal Electric Generating Project near <br />Page, Arizona. <br /> <br />Recipe (or a Prescription) for a Major Power Development <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The old days are gone when each utility decided what size generating station it would install <br />-and proceeded to install it-generally in its local service area. Gone too, seemingly, are the days <br />when the Bureau of Reclamation built hydroelectric powerplants wherever a good site was available <br />-and thus they had dollars from power revenues to payoff the power and water costs of new projects. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In fact, Peter McTague, a utilities consultant of Gilbert Associates, began a speech recently to a <br />group of utility executives with the unsettling remark, "I wonder how many of you realize you are <br />working in a dying industry." He did not mean it literally', of course, because demand for electric <br />power is growing at such a rate that utilities must double their output in the next 7 years. McTague <br />was talking about the evolutionary crisis the industry now faces because of new social pressures. <br /> <br />The Southwest is no exception. In fact, in growth rate it has exceeded the national trend <br />during the past two decades. Between 1950 and 1960, the population of the Southwest increased <br />39% compared with 19% for the Nation as i whole. While California will have the fastest growth in <br />terms of numbers, Nevada and Arizona will maintain the first and third highest percentage growth <br />rates in the Nation. <br /> <br />Such growth requires great quantities of electric power. So early in 1967, Salt River Project-as <br />were other utilities-started studying alternative sources of power for the mid-1970's. <br /> <br />Southwestern utilities, including Salt River Project, had previously participated 1n WEST-type <br />Slide 1 planning for the major Four Corners and Mohave coal-fired generating plants. These massive joint <br />ventures had come about because of the relative economy of mine.mouth type coal burning plants of <br />extra-large size-jointly owned-so that each had to have reserves to cover ollly its share of the unit <br />in case of outage. <br /> <br />One of the most challenging and perplexing problems a utility or a group of utilities must face IS <br />deciding where to locate large generating plants, so as to provide the desired power supply at the <br />lowest possible cost. <br /> <br />There used to be four extremely critical requirements in any site consideration: <br /> <br />Slide 2 1. Competitively priced fuel to feed the massive thermal boilers-23,000 tons a day at the Navajo <br />Plant. Coal fuel had to be the first consideration for the mid-70's because gas fuel pnces had doubled <br />in the preceding ten years and nuclear plants were not yet proving to be competitive in this area. <br /> <br />Slide 3 2. An adequate, reliable supply of cooling water. You can't invest half a billion dollars in a <br />plant and transmission system and not have an assured source of cooling water at all times, <br /> <br />Slide 4 3. Nearby townsite large enough to support the facility during both its construction and opera- <br />ting stages. <br /> <br />-23- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.