|
<br />Page 1 of 2
<br />
<br />Table V
<br />
<br />Summary of Water Budget Data
<br />Wellton-Hohawk Irrigation and Drainage District
<br />(In Acre-Feet)
<br />
<br />1. Water delivered to Project
<br />(Station 790, GGMC)
<br />
<br />1975
<br />
<br />1976
<br />
<br />1978
<br />
<br />1981
<br />
<br />1979
<br />
<br />1980
<br />
<br />1977
<br />
<br />528,370 472,760 424,780 432,610 286,910 327,300 425,880
<br />
<br />2. Drainage pumping (Station 0+00, WHHCC) 209,726 203,081 204,081 184,920 179,053 192,339 152,750
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />3. Diversions minus returns
<br />
<br />4. Change in aquifer storage
<br />
<br />5. Drainage pumping for no change in
<br />aqu Her storage
<br />
<br />6. Acreage with depth less than 8' to
<br />water table for December
<br />
<br />7. Acreage with depth less than 6' to
<br />water table for December
<br />
<br />8. Effective rainfall to fanns
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />9. Farm irrigation water delivery
<br />10. Total crop consumptive use
<br />,
<br />
<br />II.
<br />
<br />Crop consumptive use of irrigation
<br />water
<br />
<br />12.
<br />13.
<br />
<br />Deep perco lat ion frem farms
<br />
<br />Farm irrigation efficiency (\)
<br />(adjusted for rainfall)
<br />
<br />Acres irrigated
<br />
<br />14.
<br />
<br />330,693 286,984 241,091 263,371 125,768 1~8,~37 286,808
<br />-6,721 -8,187 -27,982 -35,184 +90,646 -10,106 -44,991
<br />
<br />203,000 195,000 176,000 150,000 270,000 [82,000 108,000
<br />
<br />30,030 29,670 16,430 7,230 52,780 5~.R50 36,561
<br />
<br />10,927 8,940 2,500 1,350 35, 540 3~), lJO 6,684
<br />10,048 34,813 40,342 18,787 17,8LJl 11.102 10,903
<br />489,247 436,930 391,618 398,862 331,864 35\ .'150 389,105
<br />277,053 267,058 254,902 255,027 217,473 241,047 247,885
<br />
<br />267,005
<br />222,242
<br />
<br />239,208
<br />
<br />236,240
<br />162,622
<br />
<br />;' J;~ JIll!)
<br />
<br />236,9ll2
<br />152,123
<br />
<br />199,660
<br />132,20~
<br />
<br />222,628
<br />168,990
<br />
<br />1,ILI05
<br />
<br />197,722
<br />
<br />54.6
<br />
<br />56.8
<br />
<br />59.2
<br />
<br />(;('. I
<br />
<br />60.9
<br />
<br />60.2
<br />
<br />54.7
<br />
<br />65,529
<br />
<br />60,622
<br />
<br />60,123
<br />
<br />57,265::1
<br />
<br />,- -413/
<br />:J81h -
<br />
<br />60,348
<br />
<br />64,684
<br />
<br />1/ Effective rainfall was reduced by 1/3 as approximately 1/3 of the District had depth-t.uI!ru'III<I-wJter levels at
<br />o to 4 feet. It is felt that rainfall would not reduce crop consumptive use where crop'; (,lll ,I>e ground wJter.
<br />2( Approximately 3,000 acres were out of production due to high ground-water levels as a ""',..011. of Gila River
<br />
|