Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11 <br /> <br />X is equal to 1 for normal rainfall years. For the rainfalls in 1976 and 1977 X is estimated to be 0.80 from Tabl~ "11 I, PI' nil, <br />Irrigation of Agricultural Lands, Number 11 in the sertes Agronomy. <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />The acreage reduction program removed the following citrus from 1975 through 1977: <br /> <br /> 383 acres Grapefru it <br /> 715 acres Lemons <br /> 2 ,962 acres Oranges <br />. Total 4,060 acres Citrus <br /> <br />1,532 AF Cu <br />3,003 AF Cu <br />9,775 AF Cu <br /> <br />14,310 AF Cu <br /> <br />3,736 AF Oe1. <br />6,129 AF De 1. <br />27 ,929 Af Del. <br /> <br />37,794 AF Del. <br /> <br />1977 Erf. <br />1977 Err. <br />1977 Erf. <br /> <br />41t <br />49t <br />35t <br /> <br />1977 Erf. <br /> <br />35% <br /> <br />This acreage was added back in to see the effects of citrus removal. The lrrigation efficiency was lncreased by 2.1 I ':r ((~Ilr (1)6.8 - <br />54.6) and the deep percolation was reduced by 25,644 acre-feet (194,757 - 169,113). <br /> <br />3/ The acreage reduction program moved the fo11owlng citrus from 1975 through 1978: <br /> 398 acres Grapefruit 1,592 AF Cu 3,980 AF Del. 1978 Erf. 40t <br /> 813 acres Lemons 3,415 AF Cu 7,266 AF Del. 19/11 Erf. 4/~ <br /> 3,451 acres Oranges 11,388 AF Cu 33,494 AF De 1. 19711 Ef f. 3U <br /> Total 4,662 acres Citrus 16,395 AF Cu 44,740 AF De 1. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This acreage was lldrled back in to see the effects of citrus removal. The Irr1l)ation efficiency was incr"cC1scd hy 'lh"1I1 ',I; l"'..rl~nt <br />(59.2 _ 56.6) and the deep percolation was reduced by 29,802 acre-feet (192,424 - 162,622) as a resull of cilrus ''0'"'' .,1, <br /> <br />An additional 2.0 percent (56.6 - 54.6) lncrease in Dlstrlct efficiencies is thought lo be due to the lrrigalion Err" ;,'nry [onprovemenls <br />Programs. such as the lrrigat10n Management Services irrigation scheduling program and the Soil Conseryation Servirl', {1nf,lnn lHlprovement <br />Program. The 1972 - 1976 average irrigation efftciency prior to the acreage reduction program and prior to signifj. .I"! t'Y.I1.111510/1 of <br />irrigation efficiency improvement programs in the WHI&DD was 54.6 percent. <br /> <br />4/ <br /> <br />To show the savings in deep percolation thought to be due to the nofann improvement programs, the following prOCedUi"I' \.lIS ll'ied: <br /> <br />1978 Irrigation efficiency adjusted for effectlve rainfall' <br />Irrigation efficiency savings due to onfarm improvement programs <br />Irrigation efficiency without onfarm lmprovements = <br />Irrigation farm delivery required. 236,240 . 413,007 <br />.~/2 <br />Deep percolation saved = 176,767 AF - 162,622 . 14,145 AF <br /> <br />59.2t <br />2.0t <br />'5T.ZI <br /> <br />5/ <br /> <br />Effective rainfall to farms was reduced by 1/3 as approximately 1/3 of the District (20,000 acres) had a depth to (Jr.nlllld .....,ller of 0 to 4 <br />feet. Rainfall Is not expected to be conswnpt1vely used if crops are using ground water. <br /> <br />Hote: <br /> <br />The trends in Irrlgatlon efficiencies from 1975 - 1978 tend to support the use of effeclive rainfall to farms. I/ithoul including <br />effective ralnfall it becomes difficult to explain a drop In project lrrigatlon efficiency in 1978 from 65.1 - 6.1.'/ when 600 acres of <br />citrus was removed and on farm improvements had been installed on about 8.000 acres. and IMS scheduled over 35,OOll dr:res. <br />