My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02109
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02109
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:32 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:55:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1993
Title
News Articles - Press Releases re: Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Page 3 WRW washn x x x rivers <br />AR WESTERN WATER PROGRAM <br />WRW asked Pontius about AR's initiative relative to the West. Be- <br />cause of the perennial shortage of water in the 17 Western reclamation <br />states, river systems in the West are even more critical to the survival <br />of man and our animal, aquatic and plant neighbors than elsewhere, he <br />stressed. "Like man, the overwhelming percentage of fish and wildlife, <br />especially endangered species, live close to rivers," Pontius told WRW. <br />That means man and other types of ,life are even more competitive for <br />space along river systems in the West than elsewhere, he observed. <br />The AR Western water program is Pontius' responsibility. He has <br />the help of three field staffers in the Northwest and Southwest. He <br />relishes the assignment, which includes reform of the Central Arizona <br />project (CAP) and of the Bureau of Reclamation (Bu/Rec), virgin River <br />protection, and Rio Grande restoration. But he says it is tough to <br />raise $$$ for this type of effort, meaning few contributors are willing <br />to pony up dough for such prosaic issues as CAP and Bu/Rec reforms. <br />But protection of the Virgin River is a fascinating subject, as the <br />Virgin is one of the last of the free-flowing rivers in the West and one <br />of the few rivers flowing interstate still without a compact, or a <br />determination as to how its waters are to be apportioned among utah, <br />Arizona and Nevada thru which the Virgin flows before entering the <br />Colorado River at Lake Mead in Nevada. AR says "competition is intense" <br />over the waters of the Virgin, "especially between Las Vegas," one of <br />the fastest growing areas of the country, "and Southern utah." Gail <br />Peters, AR Southwestern representative, told WRW on Jan. 10 that "St. <br />George, utah, is the fastest growing city in the West, and utah wants to <br />dam the virgin" to assure water for St. George and to reserve as much <br />water as possible for utah, one of the fastest growing states in the <br />country. AR appears to be leaning toward Las Vegas in this interstate <br />water dispute primarily over the utah dam issue. WRW asked Ms. Peters <br />whether she had raised the question of unbridled growth at meetings on <br />the Virgin River. Yes, she replied, but she had been given short shift; <br />local representatives questioned her credibility "because I have lived <br />only 15 years in the West." A native of Michigan, Ms. Peters is a self- <br />confessed "desert rat" who has lived in Arizona since 1978. Control of <br />growth is a local responsibility, and the subject isn't even on the <br />radar screen in her part of the world, Ms. Peters told WRW. <br />Cleaning up the Rio Grande will be a huge undertaking. River <br />clean-up is linked to the new NAFTA trade treaty for North America, both <br />Pontius and Ms. Peters observed. This clean-up package is in the pro- <br />cess of being put together. When it is ready to go, it will be top <br />priority with AR, which listed the Rio Grande as "the most endangered <br />river in North America for 1993." <br />Relative to CAP, AR is concentrating on the conservation aspects of <br />this $4.7 billion Bu/Rec project and is highly cr i tical of both the <br />Bu/Rec and the state of Arizona for their failure to pay much, if any, <br />attention to fish and wildlife enhancement. In his testimony on CAP on <br />Dec. 10 at the Congressional oversight hearing, Pontius stated, "One of <br />the (CAP) project purposes set forth" in the 1968 Colorado River Basin <br />Project Act (P.L. 90-537) authorizing CAP was" I the conservation and <br />development of fish and wildlife purposes.' Yet 25 years and $4 billion <br />later, not a dime has been spent to carry out that express purpose...No <br />thought was given and no money directed to alleviating and redressing <br />the impacts of the state I s depleted water resources," he stated. (more) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.