|
<br />.1\.~.ftl!l,. /
<br />'.J :J iT 1iI..l 0" .'. ~,~
<br />
<br />'.
<br />
<br />Federal minerals and Non-Federal surface.estate would be established as NSO for oil and gas
<br />leasing, and would be withdrawn from settlement, sale, location, or entry under the general land
<br />laws, including the mining laws. The other proposed management prescriptions included in the
<br />proposed planning amendment (inclusion in the SRMA and establishing land use priorities)
<br />would not affect this private or State owned surface estate:
<br />
<br />T. 1 N., R. 80 W.,
<br />Sec. 20, NW'ANW'A;
<br />
<br />T. 1 N., R. 81 W.,
<br />Sec. 28, N'I2SW'A and SW'ASW'A; .
<br />Sec. 29, SE'ASE'k
<br />
<br />T. 1 S., R. 82 W.,
<br />Sec. 14, SW'ASW\4;
<br />Sec. 22, N'I2NE'A, SW\4NE\4 and SW'A;
<br />Sec. 23, NW1ANW'A;
<br />Sec. 26, lot I, and SW\4NW'A;
<br />Sec. 27, lots 1 and 2, inclusive, and i-W2SE4;
<br />Sec. 33, thai portion of Tract 70 lying within the NW'ANW'k
<br />
<br />T. 2 S., R. 82 W.,
<br />Sec. 4, lot 22;
<br />Sec. 7, that portion of Tract 41 lying within Section 7.
<br />
<br />The privately owned or State of Colorado owned lands with Federal mineral estate that would be
<br />affected by the proposed planning amendment, involve approximately 1,020 acres in Grand and
<br />Eagle counties.
<br />
<br />C. The proposed planning amendment would also identify the following privately owned lands
<br />as NSO for oil and gas leasing, and as withdrawn from settlement, sale, location, or entry under
<br />the general land laws, including the mining laws, if the lands were ever acquired by the Federal
<br />government. There would be no affect on the lands at this time, nor would the proposed
<br />planning amendment have any effect on private property rights. If the lands were ever acquired
<br />by the Federal government through sale or exchange, they would automatically come under the
<br />umbrella of the NSO and the lands/minerals withdrawal associated with the proposed action.
<br />The other management prescriptions included in the proposed action (inclusion in the SRMA and
<br />establishing land use priorities) would not affect these lands. The inclusion of the lands in the
<br />SRMA or the establishing of land use priorities would be considered in environmental
<br />documents prepared for the acquisition action.
<br />
<br />T. IN., R. 79 w.,
<br />Sec. 7, lot 4, SE'ASW'Ia, and SV2SE4;
<br />Sec. 18, lots I and 2, and NE'A, E'I:zNW'Ia, NE'ASW'A, and N'I2SE'/a.
<br />
<br />T. IN., R. 80 W.,
<br />Sec. 12, S'I2S'/2;
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />3
<br />
|