My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02042
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02042
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:05 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:53:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa General Publications - Correspondence - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
3/24/2000
Author
BLM
Title
Kremmling Resource Management Plan Amendments
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />n""(.'''~ <br />,j .... <br />v ,j I> ,. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />resource information generated during completion of rangeland health assessments for several livestock <br />grazing allotments. These specific rangeland health assessments affect parcels MP-3, MP-5. MP-6, MP- <br />7, MP-I J, Np-2, and NP-3. That information is available in the following environmental assessments, <br />which are on file in the Field Office: <br />MP-L... EA-CO-OI8-99-26 MP-5.........EA-CO-OI8-99-69 <br />MP-Il.... EA-CO-OI8-99-69 NP-2.........EA-CO-OI8-99-32 <br />NP- 3...... EA-CO-OI8-99-33 MP-6.........EA-CO-018-99-69 <br />MP-7...... USFS's SkylarklMule Creek CallIe & Horse Allotment Environmental Assessment <br /> <br />CRITICAL ELEl\1ENTS <br /> <br />ENVIRONl\1ENTAL JUSTICE <br /> <br />Affected Environment:. The parcels described in the proposed action are primarily used by, and located <br />adjacent to lands owned by nonminority populations and higher income populations. These owner and <br />user populations include ranchers, wealthy propeny owners, hunters, and recreationists. <br /> <br />Environmental Consequences cf Proposed Action: Assigning land use priorities to parcels of acquired <br />land would not have a disproponionate impact on racial, ethnic, or socioeconomic groups. <br /> <br />INVASIVE, NONNATIVE SPECIES <br /> <br />Affected Environment: Some of the acquired parcels have small populations of invasive, nonnative <br />species present, primarily noxious weeds. BLM has an active weed control program. <br /> <br />Environmental Consequences of Proposed Action: Assigning land use priorities to parcels of acquired <br />land would not have an impact on the BLM's ability to treat and control invasive, nonnative species. <br /> <br />AIR QUALITY <br /> <br />Affected Environment: Air quality in the Resource .Area is believed to be good. The air quality section <br />in the RMP details local conditions and is still generally accurate., except that the tepee burners in Nonh <br />and Middle Park have been removed since the plan was written. <br /> <br />Environmental Consequences of Proposed Action: Designating land use priorities for the acquired <br />parcels does notimpact air quality. <br /> <br />CULTURAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Affected Environment: Cultural resources inventory has not been completed for the acquired lands. The <br />potential for discovery of cultural resources is considered low to high depending on land forms and <br />elevaticn, proximity to and elevation above watet. aspect, and availability of floral/faunal and lithic <br />resources. Thus, the potential varies from parcel to parcel, and even within individual parcels. <br /> <br />Environmental Consequences of Proposed Action: The proposed action of assigning land use priorities to <br />acquired lands would not affect cultural rescurces. Cultural resources would be protected by Federal <br />Law. Site specific actions taken as a result of acquisition and assignment of land use priorities would <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.