My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02042
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02042
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:34:05 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:53:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa General Publications - Correspondence - Reports
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
3/24/2000
Author
BLM
Title
Kremmling Resource Management Plan Amendments
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />O~')!.e.,., <br />~J_ ....v <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />Some motorized recreation use occurs in the area immediately adjacent to the river but is limited <br />due to the lack of suitable vehicle routes and the topography of the canyons. The upland areas <br />receive higher levels of motorized use, especially during the fall hunting seasons. There are <br />several old two track roads that provide motorized access to some river sites. <br /> <br />The 'majority of the project area is currently classified as 'Open' in the Off-Highway Vehicle plan <br />adopted in 1988. Several of the primitive roads in the area have seasonal limitations to restrict <br />access during the spring when the road surfaces are soft. Some ofthe routes had 'deferred' <br />limitations for seasonal closures during the summer boating season, until such time as the use <br />levels or conflicts between users increased. Two of these routes, one to the hot springs area and <br />the other to the Benches area, have been closed seasonally during the boating season for the past <br />several years after the conflicts between motorized vehicle users and river users reached <br />unacceptable levels. These closures have greatly reduced the conflicts, but some motorized use <br />occasionally occurs on both routes during the closure period. <br /> <br />Environmental Consequences of Proposed Action: . <br />Management Prescription #1 (Boundary Adjustment): The boundary adjustment is an <br />administrative action that would not directly affect the recreation activities. The boundary would <br />be expanded to include lands important to the river recreation experience. <br /> <br />Management Prescription #2 (Identifying Land Use Priorities): Identifying the majority of the <br />proposed SRMA with a recreation land use priority would help BLM to emphasize the recreation <br />uses and needs along the river corridor into the future. As described in the RMP, a recreation <br />priority is generally compatible with other resource uses, including mineral development, <br />livestock grazing (Although grazing may be excluded on a site specific basis from developed or <br />intensively used recreation sites.), soils objectives, watershed goals, water quality, wildlife (The <br />priority requires protection of Critical wildlife habitat, including T &E species habitat.), cultural <br />resources, and major realty actions. Excluded uses in a recreation priority include new mineral <br />material sales, wilderness, and community expansion. The recreation priority would provide <br />management direction for the recreational values in the SRMA in conjunction with the various <br />other resources in the SRMA and the language of the RMP. <br /> <br />Management Prescription #3 (NSO for Oil and Gas Leasing): This prescription would be a <br />benefit to virtually all recreation activities in the SRMA as there would be no ground disturbance <br />associated with oil and gas development. <br /> <br />Management Prescription #4 (LandlMineral Withdrawal): <br />This prescription would be a benefit to virtually all recreation activities in the SRMA as there <br />would be no ground disturbance or dredging activities along the river associated with mining <br />activity. Precluding mining activity would help protect the monetary investment the BLM has in <br />recreational development along the river corridor. <br /> <br />VISUAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Affected Environment: <br />The project area is classified in the Visual Resource Inventory completed in 1980 as: <br /> <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.