Laserfiche WebLink
<br /><<:;:"'58 <br /> <br />The hunting and fishing evaluations on John Martin Reservoir are <br />fairly reliable and based upon checks made when the reservoir was USG'- <br />able for these purposes. The usage figures were assumed for the Granada <br />Reservoir. The direct benofits attributable to fish and w.Lldlifo USes <br />are shown in tho following tabulation: <br /> <br />Direct Fish a'Od Wildlife Benefits <br /> <br />Fishing in John Martin Rosorvoir. . . . . . . . $ 5h;540 <br />Hunting in John Martin Reservoir. . . . . . .. 28,660 <br />Fishing in Granada Reservoir. . . . . . . . .. 21,210 <br />Hunting in Granada Rnservoir. . . . .. ... _~1~90 <br />T " '8 <br />otal benefits 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .~14 ~ 700 <br /> <br />FINANCIAL ANALYSIS <br /> <br />The total construction cost of the potential Granada Reservoir <br />Project is $7,296,000~ based on April 1953 prices. Tho projected long <br />range construction cost basod on an ENR index of 180 (1939 = 100) wovld <br />be ~t5,326,Ooo. The total annual oporation, maintenance and roplacement <br />costs are estimated to be $5,400. <br /> <br />Cost allocation <br /> <br />The total projoct costs have been allocated to the functions of <br />irrigation and fish and wildlife conservation according to tho ratio <br />of their respective n0t direct benefits to total net diroct bonefits <br />as shown in the following tabulation. Annual operation, maintenance <br />and replacoment costs are to b 0 borne by irrigation. <br /> <br />Summary of Cost Anocation <br /> <br />Fish and <br />Total Irrigation l~ildlife <br /> <br />Net direct benefits. ~ . ..$ 257,200 $ 108,500 <br />. Ratio... . . . . . . . .. . 100% 42% <br />Construction costs. . . . ~5,326,OCO ~2,237,000 <br />Annual O.M. & R. . . . . . ~ 5.400 ~ 5,400 <br /> <br />$ 148,700 <br />58% <br />$3,089,000 <br /> <br />Benofit-Cost ratio <br /> <br />The benefit-cost detorminations are shown in tho following tabula- <br />tionst <br /> <br />- 9 - <br /> <br />