Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br />0'.1 <br />CJ) <br />(Jf <br /> <br />Bureau of Reclamation <br />Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program <br />Accomplishments for Fiscal Year 1998 <br /> <br />Colorado'River Water Use Data <br /> <br />Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS) is used extensively by Reclamation to forecast salinity <br />conditions' and evaluate compliance with the water quality (salinity) standards. To accomplislrthis <br />task, accutatewater use data is needed as a base for these predictions. In cooperation with thi: <br />Upper Basin States. Reclamation has created a GIS database of irrigated field boundaries and crop <br />types to refine current water use estimates in the entire basin. In 1998, Reclamation completed its <br />water use estimates for the Colorado River Basin thru 1990. Reclamation started work on the <br />1991-95 period in 1998. <br /> <br />Update to: Economic Impacts Model <br /> <br />In cooper*ion with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Reclamation is <br />nearing completion of a major update of its salinity impact model. The model is current version <br />of the moclel is available in a Lotus spreadsheet format. Crop types and acreages in the model <br />have been'updated. The crop damage functions have been updated using scientific studies <br />conducted!by the USDA Salinity Research Lab in Riverside, California. Car radiator impacts <br />have been:dropped due to advances in their designs. Studies by MWD completed on M&I <br />impacts insouthem California. These impacts will be integrated into the model in 1999. Salinity <br />management costs (agricultural drainage costs) will also be investigated in 1999. <br /> <br />Salinity Control Verification Studies <br /> <br />Salinity cqntrol verification studies can be extremely difficult to conduct; however, they are <br />essential to our understanding of the mechanisms of source controls. At times these studies can <br />be both expensive and difficult to measure due to the diffuse nature of the problem. Some areas <br />are geologically more suited to monitoring and verification. <br /> <br />ReclamatiQn has commissioned a series of studies (conducted by the USGS) to evaluate the <br />effectiveness of salinity control measures in areas where significant progress has been made in <br />implemen~ng salinity control practices. Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-427, "Trend <br />Analysis of Selected Water Quality Data Associated with Salinity-Control Projects in the Grand <br />Valley, in1heLower Gunnison River Basin, and at Meeker Dome, Western Colorado," founll <br />evidence that salinity levels in the main river channels dropped significantly in these project <br />areas. Th~ Meeker Dome evaluation positively concluded that the well plugging project <br />continues to be very effective. Studies were also conducted in the Grand Valley area to further <br />investigat~ the drop in salinity levels that the USGS has observed in the river by evaluating <br />drainage water leaving the project area. A fact sheet was prepared by the USGS showing that the <br />downward!trend observed in the river was also observed in the irrigation drainage water. Studies <br />are also urlderway in several of the USDA area. The Uintah Basin Unit Monitoring and <br />Evaluation, Study was published in February 1998. It updated a USGS study of the Uintah Basin <br />showing si~ificant downward trends in the river. <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />,;}' <br /> <br /> <br />"'! <br />'", <br />,:J <br /> <br />.} <br /> <br />(} <br />l <br /> <br />,; <br />"'! <br /> <br />