My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP01912
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1001-2000
>
WSP01912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:33:22 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 10:44:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.129.D
Description
Upper Gunnison Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
3/1/1964
Author
USDOI - BOR
Title
Reconnaissance Report - Upper Gunnison Project-Colorado - March 1964
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /><:1.) <br />In <br />LI1 <br />~ <br /> <br />CHAPTER vII <br /> <br />CONCLUfoIONS <br /> <br />The following conclusions have been drawn from the reconnaissance in- <br />vestigations summarized in the preceding chapters, <br /> <br />1. Feasibility investigations are warranted of a multiple-purpose <br />project in the Upper Gunnison River Basin, It would be preferable for the <br />investigations to be made of the entire basin rather than of individual <br />unit developments such as outlined in the Bureau of Reclamation's 1951 <br />reconnaissance report, Feasibility investigations for the comprehensive <br />development would require a period of about 5 years, <br /> <br />2, The optimum scale of irrigation development cannot be determined <br />without further consideration of potential full service lands, particular- <br />ly the suitability of such lands for irrigation and the practicability of <br />developing them into new farm units. Feasibility investigations should be <br />started with a study of a small representative area of presently unirri- <br />gated lands and the findings for that area used as a basis for determining <br />the scale of irrigation development for detailed study, If study of the <br />representative area showed development of new farm units to be impracti- <br />cal, investigations should then be centered on a small irrigation develop- <br />ment on the order of that outlined in Chapter VI, Study of the representa- <br />ti ve area would require about a year. <br /> <br />3, Costs of the project power development as now analyzed could not <br />be paid in 50 years if power were transmitted over the Colorado River <br />Storage project system and sold at the present storage project rates, The <br />desirability of including power as a project purpose should be reconsid- <br />ered in future project studies. <br /> <br />4. Fish and wildlife conservation and recreation would be important <br />purposes of the project, and cooperative planning for these purposes with <br />the agencies responsible should be continued, <br /> <br />49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.