Laserfiche WebLink
<br />manner as is used in connection with project& for white people; (2) No projects <br />for the use of Indians shall participate in any benefits: ensuing from Colorado <br />River Storage Proje~t unless; such Indian Projects shall in all respects be on <br />an equality with the projects for white people. . <br /> <br />3. RESOLVED Tqat the construction of the Glen Canyon Unit of the proposed <br />Colorado ~ver Storage Project shall be deferred until such time as it appears that <br />the Echo Park, Gunn~son River, and other units of that project are inadequate to <br />serve the needs of 1;.he Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />4. (Not verbatim) RESOLVED That the first units to be constructed should be <br />the Echo Park and G~nison River Units. <br /> <br />MR. HUNTER: It is almost dinner time. What are you gentlemen 's desire on <br />this matter? <br /> <br />JUDGE STONE: I,et us have the :resolutions read one by one and act on them. <br />MaYbe we can finish up this morning and won't have to come back after dinner. <br /> <br />MR. BREITENSTEIN: (Reread Resolution No.1). <br /> <br />JUDGE STONE: The resolution has \:sen read. Does someone wish to move that <br />this be approved as'read? <br />MR. McDANIEL: Jfuat all is covered by the word "detail"? <br />MR. BREITENSTE]]J: By "details" we mean to go into all the small features of <br />the report such as sediment, holdover storage, evaporation, reservoir capacities, <br />economics, etc. <br /> <br />MR. McDANIEL: !ioea; it mean that you will select the participating projects? <br /> <br />MR. TIPTON: "Detail" has no referen<::e to participating projects. Participa- <br />ting projects are not included in the present report. (Gave long discussion of <br />minor items that wOuld be considered as details). <br /> <br />MR. .llISON: I believe the overall plan is a good plan but I'm not willing to <br />say what projects shQuld be constructed first, second, etc. More thought should be <br />given to the criteria tl1at is to be used in d8lliermining what sho\l1d be constructed <br />first. No sites havt;l been chosen on the San Juan River. No detennination has yet <br />been made why no reservoirs were chosen on the Upper San Juan. The Glen Canyon <br />site is of no immedi~te benefit to the Upper Basin. I believe all possibilities <br />should be explored b~fore making a detennination of what should be constructed. <br /> <br />MR. LARroN: (Describes the proposed electrical circuits and inteconnections) <br />A small plant at the .)3luff Site in the beginning could not serve the power market <br />without tremendous c~st. <br /> <br />MR. McDANIEL: Will you read the first resolution again? <br />MR. BREITENSTEIN I (Reads: first resolution again). <br /> <br />MR. McDANIEL: Tpis meeting includes; people from New Mexico. The resolution <br />is resolved by whom? <br /> <br />JUDGE STONE: It. is understood that these resolutions involve the Colorado <br />interests only. <br /> <br />MR. McDANIEL: Tl'lGln I move that the resolution be adoptGld as read by Mr. <br />Breitenstein, -7w <br /> <br /> <br />"'-" <br />