Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-10- <br /> <br />Mr. Jex stated that although the /noneyhad been authorized, the studies in- <br />dicatethat it is not entirely repayable, and that in his opinion it might be <br />brought in as a participating project. <br /> <br />Mr. Woodall saili that he was alarmed at the contemplated transmountain <br />diversions, and aske~ if itwQuld be pOSSible to have a power projeet constructed <br />in the area ot; Aspeni to compensate for the water which has been lost to that area <br />by transmountain di~rsions. <br /> <br />Mr. Larson repJiied that a study was being made of the Colorado River above <br />Grand Junction, and 'all such possibilities would be fully investigated. <br /> <br />Mr. Neill and Jud/1;e Stone emphasized that the purpose of this meeting is to <br />obtain the views an4 comments of the people of the state so that the Water Con- <br />servation Board ~)formulate formal comments on the interim report. , <br /> <br />Mr. O'Rourke s1;iated that he was uncertain as to whether or not the Ridgeway <br />project was to be i~cluded in the list of participating projects. <br /> <br />Judge Stone an$wered that there were many cpestions which would have to be <br />answered before thif! could become a participant in the progran. <br /> <br />"ince th~re were no further comments the meeting was adjourned. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />... .... . . .'. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.1 <br /> <br />'it; "'" <br />